Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I still think we should toss out the old card catalog and have a bonfire. In fact, we _have_ taken out our card catalog and the old cards make great scratch paper. Nicholson Baker's article made me react in a very different way. It seems obvious he doesn't know what life is like in a lively school library. There are many kinds of librarys with many different needs, and perhaps a rare book library might need the history of all those generations of catalogers scrawling their notes on the cards. But in my library, the main point is--can the students find the materials quickly and easily? And are they being trained in the technology they will need to navigate the College Libraries in their future? I see no earthly reason why I would need to enshrine the original purchase price of a novel acquired in 1969, or whether it was on the shelf in 1974. I love our computer catalog; I'm ecstatic I will (god willing) never file another card again; and, best of all, the students are experts on finding what they want FAST. Shannon Acedo Marlborough School Los Angeles, CA On Tue, 6 Dec 1994, Cathy Cheely wrote: > Before you dump your card catalog or your shelf list, I think > you (and everyone else thinking of doing the same) should read > an article that appeared in The New Yorker, April 4, 1994 > entitled "The trashing of America's great libraries". Until I > read that, I felt that we should just toss out the old card > catalog and shelf list and have a bonfire. After I read it, I > felt COMPLETELY different. The writer, Nicholson Baker, > explores some areas that I had never once contemplated. If at > all possible, read it. > > By the way,I converted to an automated catalog in the spring of > 90 and have been and still am a strong advocate of technology. > -- > Catherine Cheely - ccheely@leo.vsla.edu > Library Media Specialist,Brunswick Senior High,Lawrenceville, Va.23868 > 804 848-6287 (fax) 804 848-2796 >