Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Hi LM_NETers, I was going to send this only to the people who responded, but thought that others looking into circulation programs may be interested. The first few paragraphs are my comments to them. Thank you for your helpful responses to my question about the Mac version Marge & Karen were interested in the responses. I thought the rest of you would be interested in the other responses. Most were favorable, several gave good equipment information. I had talked to Winnebago many times for a year, but until I told them that I wouldn't trade in to receive $600 for my DOS program and I had heard I could get the Mac disks free if support is current, they wouldn't budge from their original statement. Thanks Vanessa. I did not name people or schools, but quoted what you said and also said if I couldn't get a bigger discount, I may look for a different program. The cost was more than the difference between the IBM & Mac versions, but much better than the catalog price. Although I like the DOS version, it seemed like networking would be a problem. Because of the good price, the hope that Winnebago would improve the program, and to be able to network more easily with the classrooms when we retrofit our school for a LAN, I am purchasing the Mac circ/cat from Winnebago. Below are the responses from David, Vanessa, Catie, Karen, Kristine, Shelley, Alan, and Marilyn. Thanks for the specific info about how the program works in your school. Marilyn, if I did not purchase a Mac, I would be excluded from the school LAN that was being planned. As long as I was getting the equipment, I felt I should get the software so classes could access the library catalog from any room connected to the LAN. My choices were Follett or Winnebago. Pat Bain (pbain@kalama.doe.hawaii.edu) Waialua Elementary School, 68-020 Waialua Beach Road, Waialua, HI 96791 From: David Sparks <dsparks@VAX1.Mankato.MSUS.EDU> We helped pilot the Mac version for Winnebago Software. Currently I am in a 9-12 high school and we are using a Mac Quadra for a file server and have around 12,000 titles in our database. (We did purchase a Workgroup server 95 for the file server but we are having some problems and temporarily moved our Winnebago software to the Quadra until it's checked) We are using LC 475's as search stations, for the most part. Our K-8 school uses a Workgroup Server 65 for the file server and uses SE's and LC's for search stations. The search strategy is very typcial of a Mac and easy to use for elementary and high school students. With the newer hardware the search time is fine, especially with the Ethernet network. We have had some updates that has changed the program and added features, but I don't know what the dos program has as features that the Mac doesn't. We are satisfied with the CircCat program and have had good support when we've needed it. I'm sure part of the key to success is having a good file server, faster stations, a fast network, and clean records. David Sparks dsparks@vax1.Mankato.msus.edu From: "Vanessa R. Toyokura" <toyokura@csn.org> In response to your LM-NET ? about MAC vs. DOS (IBM) Winnebago... Your hesitations about the Mac Winnebago program may have been well-founded in the past (version 2.0 or lower), but we have been very satisfied with the new version (3.0). As hard as it may be to believe a vendor, I think the Winnebago rep had it right when he said the program's features are basically the same, they just have different strong points. We have found the MAC to be _slightly_ slower when processing large batches of records, but we feel the MAC version is easier for batch edits in general. The MAC supports laser printers for barcodes -- a huge plus in ? Help M Main Menu P PrevMsg - PrevPage D Delete R Reply our book :-) . My understanding is you can export your data to disk and load it into the MAC using a program called Apple File Exchange which comes standard with the Mac. Also, a Winnebago sales rep told me that rather than charging for the new Mac software, they would just send the Mac disks instead of the DOS version if your customer support contract is current. Better check and get that one straight from the horses mouth, so to speak. That would save thousands of dollars in replacement software costs. By the way, you are not alone. Many of our libraries automated when there were not many Macs in use in our district. Now Macs are the choice of most of our schools developing new networks. The pioneers who automated with IBMs are now facing the switch to MAC. It seems easier at the current time than having to span the two platforms by bridging Mac and DOS servers. As the tech support for our district libraries (132 schools), I have a networked IBM at my right elbow and a stand-alone Mac 94and DOS servers. As the tech support for our district libraries (132 schools), I have a networked IBM at my right elbow and a stand-alone Mac at my left elbow. Both run Winnebago and we are satisfied with both. The biggest transition will probably be getting used to the MAC platform itself. Things look and "feel" different, even if you are a Windows user. This has nothing to do with Winnebago, though. Truthfully, we are real DOS fans here, but the Mac Winnebago program has improved so much, we just don't have the negative feelings we used to have. Your best bet is to see the Mac version 3.0 in operation or at least get a demo from Winnebago. Vanessa Toyokura toyokura@CSN.ORG From: SomersC@aol.com I am running a Macintosh networked Winnebago library system in San Diego. I have 7 ethernet Mac's running with full capability to catalog, run electronic card catalogs for the students and check out books and textbooks. I am running it on a Power MAC 6150 group server. I have gotten better results now that I am on the power Mac than before on a MacVX server. We are happy with the Winnebago program except for the report formats. Winnebago has promised to update them and let us do customized reports on the new version soon. The program runs very well and we have had fewer problems installing and maintaining the system than other librarians who have installed IBM networks on novell. We came over to the Winnebago Mac from Apple IIe systems two years ago. We are a reference site let me know what you need. Catie Somers From: kchepko@garnet.acns.fsu.edu I would be interested in seeing the responses you get to your question. I am in the process of setting up a single user Mac Winnebago system which will eventually be networked. Since I am new to this software, I can't give you firsthand experiences but I can say that when our county media center had several companies demonstrate their systems, the Mac version of Winnebago appeared to be far and away the best of the lot! It is _never_ easy to switch from one package to another (just ask people who are asked to go from "Word" to "WordPerfect"!!) There will always be things you liked better about the one you first use but the new one will, hopefully, have some features that will help to tip the scale in its favor. You also have to factor in compatibility. I have worked in a computer lab for several years and can honestly say that it is a huge headache to try to combine Macs and Dos machines. My suggestion at this time is to go for the Mac version but I may exercise the option to change ? Help M Main Menu P PrevMsg - PrevPage D Delete R Reply my mind at any time. Good luck with whatever you decide!! Karen Chepko From: Kristine Cole <kcole@llwnet.ll.pbs.org> After using an automation system on IBM for 9 years, I set up a new school library with Winnebago on the MAC using an Ethernet network and I am in heaven. I love working with MACs, I am delighted with the format and program Winnebago has developed for MAC, and the speed and hassle-free nature of the Ethernet network is a joy. My old network ran like molasses and froze frequently, but with the Ethernet my 5 library computers all run efficiently and at top speed whether multiple users are accessing the same part of the program or 5 different parts. My school is installing a school-wide network at the end of this year, and a wide-area network to allow dial-up modem access from home next year, and I am anxious to see how those networks work -- with Ethernet, I think they will be fine. That has been my experience--all positive, so far. Kris From: s_lochhead@mentor.unh.edu We have a 4-zone appleshare internetwork, and it runs very smoothly. Further, Winnebago runs smoothly on it. It uses a proprietary server system developed by c-tree, so you will not have to have appleshare to run on a single (library) zone. Students from all over my school can use the catalog. It is very easy to administer. The students have been happy as clams. I feel that Winne has the best user interface around. Clear, simple, and with enough onscreen prompts. We selected it over follett for that reason, since it has been adopted k-12 and we thought it far better suited to the k-4 kiddies. I have met no one using winne that dislikes it, in more than a minor way. By minor, I mean that it doesn't do what someone wants it to. As opposed to that it is uniformly unsound. Shelley From: Alan Olson <washngtn@po-1.star.k12.ia.us> Last year we installed Winnebago on a Mac system in our jr. high. I think you are correct in thinking that there are less features on the Mac side. I am not real familiar with the software but it seems to be pretty good anyway. I do have to say that it is a lot easier to administer than the dos. I am not sure how much different it is for students but the library staff will have an easier time with the mac version. I think you will find the world of computers a little less stressful if you do go to a Mac. I am a Mac user myself but I have a strong philosophy that the DOS side has a place also and that educators should accept that. In your case it seems like the only DOS machine in the place is yours so you just as well give up and just go with the Mac platform. You should not have any difficulty transfering the information you have in your current DOS system. We have Winnebago on the DOS side in three buildings and on the Mac in just one. We have been able to move all the data back and forth using Apple File Exchange which comes with the mac. New macs come with PC Exchange which is a piece of software that allows the mac to read DOS files. It may work to transfer the files also but I am not sure. If you need more specifics, let me know and I will be glad to visit in depth with our jr. high librarian about particular questions you have. I wonder what Winnebago will do as far as price if you change platforms. You can buy a license for up to 14 stations for $1000 for either platform. Even with a school full of macs on a network, I would be surprised if you would have more than 14 people who would want to sign on at one time. 100would have more than 14 people who would want to sign on at one time. Good Luck. Alan Olson, Media Specialist From: mkiefer@wildcat.novi.k12.mi.us In response to your TARGET LM_NET. I have been using the Mac version of the Winnebago program for over a year now. I do not recommend it. I feel the program was not ready for release yet. I continue to have serious problems with it - mainly it just doesn't do what a library circulation program should do. I have been online with circulation/card catalog since 1985. We had the Winnebago program then - for the Apple. Actually, that program did more than this Mac version does. Some of the problems I encountered last year have been taken care of with an update. Others persist. Batch entering and deleting are a problem; inventory was a huge problem for me, they still have not helped here; printing out of overdues is very awkward, etc. etc. You said you are new to Mac so I don't want to ramble and confuse you. At first, I thought it just couldn't handle a school of our size - approx. 1200. But, our elementary media specialists have complained also. If I can help with more specifics, let me know. Good luck! Marilyn Kiefer