Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Many thanks to David Ratner, Lois Roberts, Carol Simpson, Paul Venancio, Jan Thomas, Anne Carver, and Linda Greenwood for responding to my inquiry re posssible computer intereferenc in libraries using both the Checkpoint Security System and the Winnebago Online Catalog System. They were unanimous in reporting no inteference problems! Jan reported that Checkpoint causes static on portable radio communicators and cordless phones that are brought within close proximity of it. Lois lamented that Checkpoint is slow to respond when a "bunch" of kids go through it, causing the culprit to escape and the innocent next person to get caught! David suggested reconsidering using Checkpoint because the security targets are very obvious and students delight in tearing them out and planting them on their "friends." Paul uses Checkpoint with Follett with no interence problems, and Linda has experienced no interence problems with Winnebago and 3M (a nice surprise, given the recent discussion of problems with 3M which prompted my TARGET.) Finally, Carol Simpson offered the simple and obvious explanation for the "no problems" reported (why didn't I remember this? :-): Checkpoint uses a radio frequency (RF) system to detect improperly charged out materials. It does NOT rely on electro- magnetic (EM) detection. EM systems can be foiled by the powerful electromagnets in computer monitors and tele- visions. Of course, RF systems can be foiled by -AHA!- foil. Gum wrappers will mask RF detection pieces. But computer equipment should have no effect on an RF system. Thanks again to you all! Katie Wills -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Katie Wills Shamrock High School, DeKalb County Schools (404) 633-9235 shamrock_hs@solinet.net =========================================================================