Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Subject: CYBERPORN This is my first post. I saw the following in a freebie shopping sheet that I get in my mail. It is a regular column called The Business Computer by Franklynn Peterson and Judy K-Turkel. I got permission to post this from Peterson who requests that no one print this without getting his permission as the newspapers who buy his column would not be pleased. BTW, he thinks librarians are great! "What would you think if the government of China passed a law that tried to keep you from publishing the Declaration of Independence on the Internet? Sure it's a trick question. But not too tricky, because some members of Congress are claiming to be making laws that tell the entire world how they can and can't use the Internet. It's as if nobody in Washington knows that the Internet doesn't belong to one nation. It's incapable of being ruled by any country's laws, even ours. The folks who are crying the loudest about a need to police the Internet just show how little time they've spent using it in *any* way. Anyone who has will agree with the midwest editor whose newspaper just connected to it. He says, "I can't find the dirty sections everyone's talking about. It's awfully hard to find *anything* there." We spend many hours a week wired into computerized information exchanges from the Internet to CompuServe to America Online and beyond. We haven't yet happened on any dirty pictures, child porn ads or other things a 10-year old might find salacious. We asked other Cyberniks for leads. They didn't know, and suggested we look in one of those encyclopedic "every address on the Internet" paperback books. We do occasionally come across some shocking language passing over computer lines. But it's a lot less than in most PG-13 films. And most of what we read is pretty literate. Even our sons had to learn how to spell (and after we'd given up on them!) to get intelligible messages across. We don't dispute the fact that a Congressman is running through the House's once-hallowed halls with a file full of dirty pictures that were downloaded from someplace on the Internet. But let us tell you how much work went into compiling his X-rated library. Judge whether your 10-year-old could manage to do it without your knowledge. First, there's the mechanics. Technically speaking, the Internet is a mighty crude computer system. It's especially clumsy at showing pictures. It runs slowly at best. It takes us five minutes, on a new Pentium PC, before we can view Microsoft's home page on the Internet with all its little pictures. To keep everyone from getting bored at home while their screen gets painted with what they're trying to see, nowadays most good Internet software tries to find a way to substitute text for graphics. That way, the user sees something intelligible on screen while the lengthy graphics-copying procedure takes place. We're willing to bet that it took the Congressman, or an assistant paid to kill time, 20 or 30 minutes before he could actually see each dirty picture he hunted down. If his software wasn't sophisticated, what he saw onscreen didn't even match TV-screen quality. Getting printouts for show and tell required the patience to wait up to half an hour a picture. If your 10-year-old has the patience to put 45 minutes into printing one dirty picture, and you tend to leave him unattended for that long at a time, we suspect that he'll get into more life-threatening trouble that just looking at dirty pictures. And we're not sure we want any chipping away at one of the four great freedoms our Constitution gives us just to protect careless parents. But mechanics aside, there's a much more basic reason for Congress not to try to make laws about what can and can't be put on the Internet. It's this: The US government doesn't own it. Nobody owns it. In fact, physically the Internet doesn't exist. The Internet is made up of all the people, computers and wires that swap communications on a voluntary basis. On the Internet, there are no national boundaries. Nearly every university in the world uses it. So do most national government offices in most countries of the world. So do half the businesses in the world with 1,000 employees or more. Trying to limit what's put on the Internet would be like trying to erect fences to keep ash from Mount Pinatuba's volcanic eruption from blowing over the US. When we logged onto the Internet last week and sent a message and some files to a CPA we know in New Orleans, we connected our computer via phone line to an Ameritech office in southern Wisconsin. Ameritech sent our data to a CompuServe computer near Chicago. From there, it went to a university in New Zealand (perhaps passing first through a convenient computer in Australia or a satellite hovering in space). When the CPA checked his E-mail, our message and files got routed from New Zealand to New Orleans. The CPA firm in New Orleans uses a New Zealand router because of business ties to a New Zealand firm. It's multinational, like so many small firms are today. The Internet's ability to provide cheap, fast communication around the globe fosters multinational growth. In brief, Internet brings in foreign business and foreign capital. It helps America grow. When the New Orleans CPA swaps files and E-mail with business partners in Salt Lake City and Atlanta, they use the same New Zealand Internet connection that they're paying for to contact the New Zealand associate. So here's the hypothetical question: What if they swapped on off-color letter and it were potentially unlawful? Would the US government have to ask the New Zealand government to extradite these three fellows from New Orleans, Atlanta and Salt Lake City? Of course its ludicrous. It's even more ludicrous for Congress to still be trying, after centuries of failure, to legislate morality. And it gets even harder as we invent more boundary-defying technologies. Grow up, Congress. Trying to clean up the Internet is nothing more noble than tilting at windmills. Instead, do what you promised last time we voted you in. Clean up your own house (and senate)." Copyright 1995. P/K Associates, Inc. 3006 Gregory St. Madison, WI 53711-1847. 73220.117@COMPUSERVE.COM