Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
My apologies if you received this twice, but it appears to me to have been bounced back. OK I'll tell you up front: yes, this hit one of my hot buttons. But here goes, with apologies in advance if I offend anyone. I do not intend to offend, but to present a different point of view. Alice Newman writes: >>... and yet abandon our >religious freedoms. In fact, we fight to limit religious freedoms-we >censor these all the time. How many postings have I read this month >requesting "non-religious Christmas stories"? Talk about a contradiction >in terms! How many communities won't permit nativity scenes? As if a >nativity scene threatens our religious or intellectual freedom! I believe that religious freedom refers to the freedom to hold your own beliefs which are not those of the majority. I do not believe it refers to members of the majority religion being allowed to cram theirs down others' throats. I am not a Christian, yet I must endure as my school celebrates this Christian holiday with a tree, the choir gives a "Winter Concert" which consists of nothing but Christmas music, etc., ad nauseum. We don't celebrate Ramadan, Hannukah, Passover, or any other minority religious holidays. We may acknowledge that they exist, but never do we celebrate as we do Christmas. Our school population includes students and staff who are Jewish, Buddist, Muslim, Taoist, Zorastrian, Wiccans, and atheists. It is their right (and mine) to be affirmed in my religion, or lack of one, and not be harrassed or put down. Having a Christmas tree, a nativity scene, and/or performing Christmas music exclusively constitutes an institutional endorsement of one religion. The total absence of any other religious celebrations is a silent condemnation of all other religions. As I see it, our "forefathers" were seeking respite from the demands of a majority religion which they did not share. They wanted to ensure that the people of this country were free to practice our diverse religions without interference from the government. A public school is a part of the government and therefore should refrain from endorsing one religion. Growing up out of the majority is tough enough without making school an emotionally unsafe place for students. So yes, a nativity scene at school or city hall threatens my religious freedom and those of my non-Christian colleagues, students, and neighbors. Christians should be sensitive to others, just as caucasians need to be sensitive to non-caucasian people. Why must I spend every December feeling left out? Why must I take personal discretionary days or days without pay for my religious holidays when Christians get two weeks off for theirs? (Fortunately, my current district does not make me do this, but previous employers have.) Why must I be made to feel as if I am limiting someone else's religious freedom by requesting that we be inclusive of other religions throughout the year and reducing the inordinate amount of celebrating we do for Christmas? Again, this is my "two cents" and not meant to offend, but to give voice to a minority viewpoint. Julie Anderson, Librarian (206) 813-7301 Kentwood High School janderso@kent.wednet.edu 25800 164th Ave SE Kent, WA 98042 Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are not "Special Rights."