Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
> Teacher's organization (not union) has more classroom teachers than > librarians, so if what they want conflicts with what we want, we are out > of luck. But, is that the way the organization is supposed to represent ALL of its members? I know that this is away from the original topic, but I think it is something to think about. We have sometimes reminded them that we do pay our dues just > like everybody else, but it doesn't help much. Do you have to pay dues? In other words, is there a "fair share" policy in place where all employees contribute the dues regardless of their membership? If not, there is always the option of not joining. Of course, the benefits, insurance, etc... would then be unavailable to you. The next time someone has > an idea that they want the librarians to do for free, we either give in > or fight the battle all over. This kind of thing happens more at a > building level than district. It sounds like the district people are a little more reasonable. What would happen if the librarians had a chat with the district officers? would that help? I do sometimes ask if they will give me an > example of someone else who is doing something comparable. If no one is, > then my point is well-taken. Excellent idea. Sara Wolf Swolf@nova.wright.edu> >