Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
We hear some chat, perhaps facetious, that internet will be the library of the future. >Well, folks, we all know the internet is not like a library. >A library contains information that has been selected because it meets >certain standards of authority, accuracy, and quality. The internet has >whatever anybody and everybody posts on it. > > A library is a place where information is retrievable because it is stored >according to an organization scheme. Yahoo, Harvest and the like may give >some order, but they don't check the credentials of the information >providers. Gophers may help with the search, but they will not teach users >effective search strategies, nor help users to develop critical thinking skills. > > Has anyone ever read a selection policy or a mission statement for the >internet? Does anyone weed its holdings? Are users entitled to legally >protected confidentiality when they use the material? > >Dave Loertscher spoke today (11/3) at the Connecticut Educational Media Assn. >conference, and mentioned some place where kids were being given internet >access instead of library resources. He mentioned comparative costs: what >does one month of AOL cost per household? (My connection requires a >long-distance phone call, so just that costs me upwards of $60/month!) Dave >asked, what if that money went to a LMC or a Public Library? > >Does having a room full of books make kids (or anyone, for that >matter)educated? Does having internet access make anyone information >literate? Will the world be a better place if every state, city, school and >classroom has a home page? > >In enthusiasm for this new form of fire, let's not let the cretins burn down >the house. > >Barbara Walker >adrianw@ix.netcom.com > > >