Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
LM_NETTERS: I had a disconcerting conversation with a friend of mine (top level district administrator) concerning technology and tech support. Our situation is this: We're a small district with progressive ideas, at least up front. I have 109 computers, mostly Macs, on my site alone. There are 17 schools in this district. We have one 1 Electronics Technician who is in the maintenance department. (He doesn't know DOS commands, I just found out the hard way.) In the Administration Office we have 1 Instructional Technology Specialist who is also Media Supervisor. This person oversees all tech planning, is net administrator at the district office, advises the users of everything from fiberoptics to circulation systems, and generally projects and keeps the tech vision focused. She does alot of inservice in addition to tech support. THIS IS ALL OF OUR TECH SUPPORT STAFF!!! We have three high schools with a Mac lab, IBM lab and keyboarding lab in each. All three middle schools have classroom minilabs on an Ethernet LAN, a keyboarding IBM lab, and a Voc Ed Tech 21 Lab. The elementary schools and the tech high school also have varied computer and related technological equipment. There's much more coming if our technology plan is approved by the state. These funds may <not> be spent for personnel. (I have heard that we don't have funds to hire more tech support for so long I put the Rolaids by the phone.) Back to the conversation: When I voiced my concern over the lack of tech support (The guys up top know that I work Saturdays and/or Sundays and carry heart medication from the stress of keeping up with the LAN alone.), this very nice man said that the district office should be concerning itself with hardware support and that software problems should all be handled primarily on site. And, shouldn't the Instructional Technology Specialist help handle much of this software side? I like this guy and he is really understanding almost always, but how should I have responded to this? Is it really that simple, hardware or software? I never had our old electronics tech come in that he didn't ask for the disks when he set to work! Also, in the sane world can these two positions be expected to reasonably handle all this technology, even if the ITS had <nothing else to do> which is certainly not the case? I am doing a lot on site to solve my own problems, more than most; however, there are lots of things I'm just not capable of doing!! And my days run out of hours, and my weeks run out of days . . . . Please respond to me directly if you have insights into or analogies relevant to this. I think we've got a major educating job to do and this one's not with the kids. Send teaching tools, if you got 'em! Shamed to send my sig, Mhollifiel@aol.com PS I ran this by my trusted LM_NET friend, Pat, before posting. She suggested the following: I think you should send the e mail and say you will post a hit. Ask people if they are willing to be quoted by name or e mail address, because I am sure you will get some horror stories and a great deal of interest. People might be more willing to be open if their comments weren't attributed. :-) If there is sufficient response, I will post a HIT and will summarize if necessary. Also, will sign contributions as you sign them. Still shamed- Mhollifiel@aol.com