Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Permission has been granted by the author to post this guide to the LM_NET list. The guide can be viewed on the Web at the following URL: http://www.ucla.edu/campus/computing/bruinonline/trainers/critical.html I am sharing it with teachers in my building, and am grateful to Esther Grassian for granting me permission to post it on this list. ***************************************************************************** Thinking Critically about World Wide Web Resources by Esther Grassian, UCLA College Library The World Wide Web has a lot to offer, but not all sources are equally valuable or reliable. Here are some points to consider. Content & Evaluation * What is the purpose of the Web Page & what does it contain? * How complete and accurate are the information and the links provided? * What is the relative value of the Web site in comparison to the range of information resources available on this topic? (Note: Be sure to check with a librarian.) + What other resources (print & non-print) are available in this area? + What are the date(s) of coverage of the site and site-specific documents? + How comprehensive is this site? o What are the link selection criteria if any? o Are the links relevant and appropriate for the site? o Is the site inward-focused, pointing outward, or both? o Is there an appropriate balance between inward-pointing links ("inlinks") & outward-pointing links ("outlinks")? o Are the links comprehensive or do they just provide a sampler? o What do the links offer that is not easily available in other sources? o Are the links evaluated in any way? o Is there an appropriate range of Internet resources -- e.g., links to gophers? o Is multimedia appropriately incorporated? + Who is the audience? * How valuable is the information provided in the Web Page (intrinsic value)? Source & Date * Who is the author or producer? * What is the authority or expertise of the individual or group that created this site? + How knowledgeable is the individual or group on the subject matter of the site? + Is the site sponsored or co-sponsored by an individual or group that has created other Web sites? * Is any sort of bias evident? * When was the Web item produced? * When was the Web item mounted? * When was the Web item last revised? * How up to date are the links? * How reliable are the links; are there blind links, or references to sites which have moved? * Is contact information for the author or producer included in the document? Structure * Does the document follow good graphic design principles? * Do the graphics and art serve a function or are they decorative? * Do the icons clearly represent what is intended? * Does the text follow basic rules of grammar, spelling and literary composition? * Is there an element of creativity, and does it add to or detract from the document itself? * Can the text stand alone for use in line-mode (text only) Web browsers as well as multimedia browsers, or is there an option for line-mode browsers? * Is attention paid to the needs of the disabled -- e.g., large print and graphics options; audio? * Are links provided to Web "subject trees" or lists of subject-arranged Web sources? Other * Is appropriate interactivity available? * When it is necessary; to send confidential information out over the Internet, is encryption (i.e., a secure coding system) available? How secure is it? * Are there links to search engines or are they built-in to the document? _________________________________________________________________ To contact the author, send mail to ecz5esg@mys.oac.ucla.edu consult@ucla.edu Last updated 31 July 95 *****************************************************************************