Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
From Pat Wallace (DENWALL@aol.com): Early this month (9/2/96) I posted a query titled MULTICULTURAL COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT expressing my concern over what appeared to be a growing dependency on vendors and lack of interest in supplementing mainstream review & selection sources with "alternative press" sources: > I teach multi-age 1st-3rd in a public school Montessori Magnet in Dallas >and I'm working on an MLS at Texas Women's University. >I have been envisioning the task of putting together an excellent and >highly diverse collection of children's books and >would like to write my professional paper on this topc. I am >seeking input...on a couple of issues: >1.Using Jobbers: >...the mainstream publishing industry has waxed and waned in >..the degree of care exercised in ensuring availability of bias-free >culturally authentic children's literature. Small presses and alternative >publishers have expended more consistent energy toward this end ...Yet, >the trend toward ordering through jobbers...grows...This concerns me... >Yet, when I attempt to discuss this in my >graduate classes, most just roll their eyes, aghast at the thought of >bypassing the convenience of using jobbers. >2. Reviews: >For a number of reasons, it is hard for librarians to find reviews by >reviewers familiar with the culture of the ethnic group(s) depicted >as well as with the standards of high quality literature. Some say, just >screen for "quality" but the question is, can inaccurate, ethnocentric, >stereotypical material constitute high quality children's literature? >The vast majority of school and children's librarians are white. Even >though they are "mandated" to maintain bias-free, multicultural >collections by district and/or state guidelines, they don't get much >help in accessing a variety of reviewing and acquisition sources . ON SEPT. 20 I POSTED THIS MESSAGE: >Let me call your attention to the June '96 issue of School Library >Journal "News" on pp 10-11: "Hawaii Hands Collection > Development to Baker and Tayler"..... > "As the result of a groundbreaking arrangement between Baker and >Taylor and the Hawaii State Library, the book wholesaler has begun to >select, catalog, and process 100 percent of public library collections >on all six islands....B & T has assigned a team of 18 to do collection >development...B & T President Jim Ulsamer told SLJ that 'quite a number' >have library degrees...The team will use standard reviewing sources..." I came to Texas 3 years ago from California where I last taught first grade to a classroom 40% non-English speaking refugees --Hmong, E. European, Central American-- and the rest mostly African-American & Hispanic who spoke their own unique variants of English. 98% of the parents were on welfare. There was no library in that school. I bought my own books to read to the kids and I could only find one translation of a Hmong folktale. You can't work with a group of children like that and NOT be willing to ask hard questions about how we can best serve the needs of an increasingly diverse population. Could a Baker and Taylor serve a school like that with a plug-in collection? The news re Hawaii suggests that we do have to start debating this as a profession before sliding down the slippery slope into corporate selections. I have found little interest in these issues at TWU. I attend lectures in Technical Services and hear my professor deride those who would not want to switch over to collection development via vendors. Moreover, not a single student questions this stance. Few, if any SLIS programs regularly offer a course in multicultural collection development. You would never know a whole raft of things from sitting through classes at TWU, e.g. that most American urban school and public libraries serve a population which is already majority non-white or fast-approaching that point. That these same populations may speak as many as 40 different languages in some areas The inadequacy of mainstream reviewing and acquistion sources are never mentioned by the professors in any of my classes (and I've taken 18 units so far). I made this post because I'm starved for some meaningful discussion of these essential issues. I posted my messages to these listservs: LM_NET, PUBYAC (Public Libraries serving children & youth), PLGNET (Progressive Librarians), RPE-L (Restructuring Public Education), MULTC-ED, and the McPavilion discussion. Most responses came from the first two, but this series of HITS covers posts from all. The responses have been thoughtful, in some cases passionate, and based on a rich variety of library settings. I am very grateful to all of you for entering into this dialog. I hope that in some way it continues. Pat Wallace Harry Stone Montessori Magnet Academy Dallas, TX I have divided my HIT into several parts to make it more maneageable to load and read and I'll be posting them over the next several days. This first post is from Librarians in Hawaii and from the author of the original article in SLJ. POST #1: Diane Nakano--nakano@kalama.doe.Hawaii.Edu Salt Lake Elementary School /Hon. HI/ Sat, Sep 21, '96 >I'd like to point out that this policy holds ONLY for the State PUBLIC libraries. The PUBLIC SCHOOL libraries are under a different office and continue to make their own book selections. ********************************************************** POST#2: Candace Foster/candacef@kalama.doe.hawaii.edu Librarian/ Aina Haina Elementary/ Honolulu, HI Fri, Sep 20, '96 >I have talked to some public librarians here who are aghast over this development, but feel unable to talk openly. The school libraries in Hawaii still are doing their own ordering. We do use Baker & Taylor as our centralized source, but can order anything from their catalogs that we need, and can expend a certain percentage of our monies with any vendor that we choose. >Many years ago (in the early 70's) I opened a brand-new school library here in Hawaii with a collection of books chosen from approved lists by the vendor who had won the bid. The collection, while perfect for a new elementary school located in a community of our size on the East coast perhaps, was almost totally wrong for our school. NONE of the books were about Hawaii, or had Pacific based information. Over 25% featured African- American children . .which was great for cultural diversity at the time, but neglected to address the fact that my school had zero African-American kids, and about 75% Asian/Pacific descent. Vendors from outside really cannot adequately gauge the needs of the library clientele! ********************************************************** POST #3: Marguerite K. Ashford--mashford@punahou.edu Cooke Library, Punahou School/ Honolulu, Hawaii / Fri, Sep 20, 1996 >I'm the librarian at a private school in Hawaii. Believe me, there is significant concern here over the State Librarian's decision to outsource collection development and cataloging, not only among the librarians, but in the general population as well. Letters to the Editor, articles in our two local news- papers, etc. have all expressed concern over this decision. >While the collection development people at Baker & Taylor may be consummate professionals, some collection development needs to take place*locally*. Particularly in Hawaii, where there are *strong regional and ethnic interests* that may vary widely from branch to branch, as well as factors relating to the community (whether the public school library is adequate, how far people have to travel to a regional library, bookmobile availability,etc.). The community knowledge of the local librarian can be a vital factor in developing an appropriate collection. >I should note that the Hawaii State Library System has taken a heavy budget hit over the last year or two, and that one of the justifications given for this decision is that it allows the State Librarian to take some of the warm bodies who were doing behind- the-scenes collection development and cataloging and put them on the public service front line. >We here in Hawaii appreciate the concern and the interest expressed by our fellow professionals in the rest of the United States and around the world. It reinforces once more the impor- tance of a vehicle such as this listserv. ********************************************************** POST #4: Kelly King--keking@MAKANI.K12.HI.US Chair, Hawaii State Board of Education Committee on Public Libraries (Newly formed) To: RPE-L@uhccvm.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Restructuring Public Education Discussion List)/ Tue, Sep 24, 1996 >The Hawaii State Board of Education, which oversees the Public Library System here, has received some complaints from local librarians about the outsourcing of materials. State Librarian Bart Kane recognizes there are problems with materials selections and, I believe, is working with Baker and Taylor to coordinate input from local librarians. The system is new and there are kinks to be worked out, to be sure, but in retrospect, I do agree that there was not enough discussion during approval of the outsourcing. Now that we are here, with a contract to honor, we are cognizant of problems and will work to iron them out. Feel free to request periodic updates...! ********************************************************** POST #5: Renee Olson--ROLSON@SLJ.CAHNERS.COM News and Features Editor / School Library Journal Mon, Sep 23, 1996 >I'm pleased to hear of your desire to discuss Hawaii's decision to shift collection development to B & T. (I wrote the news story in SLJ.) >I invite you (and any of your colleagues) to write a Letter to the Editor in order to reach a large, interested audience. Letters can be sent via e-mail to slj@cahners.com. **********************************************************