Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
We converted from the DOS-based program, Columbia, because we were not pleased with the program. We LOVE Alexandria. The converted the records for us, and I know other schools have converted Follett records into Alexandria without problems. There were no problems with our conversion. For your elementary schools, I recommend you get Kids' Catalog, but it will not be able to interface with Alexandria until version 4.0, due out this summer. Contact Companion for system configurations needed with it. We have had NO problems with Alexandria, and we have used it going on 4 years now. Be sure to back up your data! --------- We are in our fourth year of using Alexandria and I love it. I'm happy with the report capability, ability to add patrons and items quickly and easily. The technical support is great, though I seldom use it. I find it easy to use and meets our needs at a PreK-5th grade school. Also, I order from Follett without barcodes. They send a disk of cataloguing info and it is easy to add items and designate barcodes. ----------------- I have been using Alexandria for 2 years. We have 4 schools now using it, and plan to have the remaining 5 online by next year. Three schools started with Alexandria and one switched from Follett, so that the whole county would have the same system. As with any system, there are things that we don't necessarily like, but overall we really like it. Tech support is good, and they seem to listen to our suggestions. -------------------- e converted from Follett Circ. PLus to Alexandria. I think this new system is so much more versatile and allows so many more reports and ways to manipulate the data. I was able to throw away all the catalog cards and now have my library totally on OPAC. We have Alexandria networked in our bldg. and hope to go district wide in the future. I am pleased with the system. The tech support is abslolutely fantastic. I almost always talk to someone immediately. With Follette I had to leave a message and wait for a return call that generally came 48 hours later. --------------- We have been using Alexandria since Nov 93. We have adopted the Alexandria System district wide and have been very happy with it. We previosly had the Folliet system ---------------- We have been using Alexandria for about 10 months and have a number of problems: 1. The catalog display does not display subtitles when one searches. 2. Dewey numbers longer than 4 decimals go over onto the next label. 3. multivolumed works are handled in a strange way, each volume as a seperate title and it is difficult to get volumes numbers on spine lables. 4. the default to sounds like is a pain My technology person my communicate with you and share a long list of problems as well as the joys. Another major problem is the fact that there is no users group meeting at ALA and no listserv, making it hard to develop a community of users. If things are not improved in the next months we will be looking for a new OPAC. ------------ I've been using Alexandria for 2 years now. I'm in a K-2 school and my fellow school 3-8 also uses it. I've not used any other totally automated system except a circulation system by Winnebago. My only problem with the system is that because it doesn't batch checkins, it is very easy to read in 2 barcodes and only have one of them "take". Although I am keenly aware of this and keep my eyes open for it, by volunteers do not always do so. Except for this one thing, I find it very easy to use. However, my collection is very small. I have only 194 students. I have no idea how long it would take a larger system to print reports, etc. For me, it's great. I hope you hear from others with larger libraries. --------- Beth Kapp, Librarian Annville-Cleona High School Annville, PA 17003 beth_kapp@acsd.k12.pa.us