Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
At 12:47 AM 7/4/97 -0700, you wrote: >Realizing this is not a popular statement, it doesn't take a master's degree >to run the LMC. It takes someone willing to learn what they do not already >know, someone who knows curriculum, technology, and literature, and a person >who works well with staff and administration to develop a program that leads >our students into the next century. I would like to add my slightly qualified support to this statement. The classroom experience is invaluable to a school librarian, and that does not come from an MLS. My degree work has stood me in good stead, but equally important has been my knowledge of the day-to-day realities of the classroom. Ideally, we would all have an MLS _and_ classroom experience; but if I had to sacrifice one or the other, for school librarians I'd go with the classroom experience and enough courses to give a thorough grounding in cataloging, selection, and reference. The personal traits mentioned above do not come from ANY program, but from the person -- they are either there or they aren't. No degree program or credential confers them. Of course, advanced degree work broadens the person's scope and most importantly, their knowledge base. There is a real difference between 'running' a library, and leading a library program. The depth and breadth of your professional preparation makes the latter an easier and more productive task -- and ultimately, a more successful one, I think. One thing I have noticed is that the degree gives you standing with other librarians and academics, as well as the public. I wonder if the whole area of 'touchiness' about degrees and such stems from the fact that in many states, for many years, the library was a dumping ground for failed teachers who had tenure -- a 'safe' place to park them until retirement. I know in my own area, there is still a perception that school librarians are really only clerks and need no training -- after all, all we do is stamp due dates in books, right? I even find this belief among some public and academic librarians. I think our struggle to change this perception in the public's mind leads us to be (perhaps) overly concerned about the academic credentials. Any comments? Mark Williams Librarian Colton High School Library mark_williams@eee.org