Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Heidi raises a good point. However, Chat just brings a new level to personal email conversations that have been going on anyway, since more people can join in. I don't think the discussion list is going to die out. And important problems and general information will still be discussed. Email has the advantage of being time independent. The listserver also creates an archive. Both of these advantages are lost in a chat format. (if not, someone will correct me). However, I don't think the topic of this conversation would have come up on the list. We were comparing favorite books with an lmnetter from Australia. In normal lm_net style it would have come up as a Target -- Hit, and the particular book/series may or may not have been listed. The Chat format made the discussion more immediate. Finally, I doubt that our 'best' contributors will confine themselves to chat. The list reaches over 8,000 people. Chat starts to get complicated with as little as 10. (at least it seemed that way to me) I did learn that some poeple have been chatting for years. It's obvious that the use of one format doesn't preclude the use of another. Think of how many times you wished you could get some quick clarification or help on something. 5 or 10 minutes 'chatting' could take the place of a week of emails. Take a little time and drop in. The software is pretty straight forward on the pc and easy to use. My 3cents (inflation), Dan Robinson Indexing Services H.W. Wilson Company Bronx, NY drobinson@hwwilson.com On 5 Jan 98 at 11:21, Heidi Rawson-Ketchum wrote: > Dan, > > Sorry to use yours as an example but this is where I jump in on this > whole "chatting" business. I realize many people have been off for > the holidays so that is one reason traffic has been light but I > don't have time or the right hours available(and to be honest very > little interest in chatting). I have really enjoyed the listserve > format in that we can do it when we have time or inclination. I > have been tolerating all of the conversation on chatting but when it > starts to become obvious that some of the "good discussion" usually > shared with all of us is now in the chat rooms it makes me a little > unhappy. What is going to happen to the interaction on the > listserve when several of our best contributors start talking only > to each other? Does anyone else have this concern or am I getting > too out of touch? I value this list and the friendships I have made > here and I would hate to see it change too much. Sorry if this > sounds a little like flaming. Happy New Year! > > Heidi Rawson-Ketchum, Librarian > Camp Branch-Prison/Branch District-Public > Both in Coldwater, MI > rawsonkehl@orion.branch-co.lib.mi.us > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To quit LM_NET (or set NOMAIL or DIGEST), Send an email message to listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST NOTE: Please allow time for confirmation from Listserv. For more help see LM_NET On The Web: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=