Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
U. S. Colleagues, I ran this by Peter before posting it to the group. Following is a *shortened* version of a message that I received from a reliable source. If you would like the entire document which includes voice and fax numbers, e-mail me <bhamilt@tenet.edu> and I'll forward it to you. My interpretation is that HR 2281 is to control *technology* while HR 3081 is designed to address the *abusers* of technology. I believe I favor the latter. Betty (signature file follows the forwarded alert) ======================================================================== Please distribute widely to appropriate forums June 3, 1998 IMMEDIATE ACTION ALERT Consumer Project on Technology (http://www.cptech.org <http://www.cptech.org> ) Electronic Frontier Foundation (http://www.eff.org <http://www.eff.org>) Electronic Privacy Information Center (http://www.epic.org <http://www.epic.org> ) DIGITAL COPYRIGHT BILL THREATENS ONLINE PRIVACY AND SECURITY CONTACT KEY REPRESENTATIVES ON THE HOUSE COMMERCE COMMITTEE SUMMARY: * Latest News: House "WIPO Copyright Treaties Implementation Act" (H.R. 2281) would over-regulate emerging technologies, eliminate privacy protections, outlaw reverse engineering and encryption security measures, and weaken fair use privileges. * What You Can Do Now: Follow the directions below and call members of House Commerce Committee. Ask them to oppose any bill that seeks to regulate technology itself, rather than the behavior that constitutes a misuse of the technology. Explain that a better alternative is H.R. 3048. For More Information, see the Digital Future Coalition http://www.dfc.org <http://www.dfc.org> _________________________________________________________________ THE LATEST NEWS On Friday June 5, the House Commerce Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Trade, and Consumer Protection will hold a hearing on H.R. 2281, the "WIPO Copyright Treaties Implementation Act." The House Judiciary Committee has already approved this bill that will dramatically alter the time honored balance between content owners and the user community. The legislation will also seriously erode the leadership that the United States currently enjoys in research and development of encryption algorithms, cryptographic products, and computer security technology. It also seriously threatens privacy online. Three sections of the bill are extremely threatening to privacy, free speech, and computer security: Section 1201 makes the use, manufacture or sale of ANY technology that can be used to circumvent copyright protections illegal. A host of vital technologies, equipment and processes "can" be, but are not intended, for such abuse, and Congress should not outlaw them, any more than they may outlaw the making or sale of crowbars or baseball bats because they "can" be used for vandalism. This will: * criminalize the manufacture, import, or use of tools necessary to perform research in cryptography. Under HR 2281, the manufacture of software tools that test the viability of a proposed encryption algorithm would be prohibited. * impede the ability of system operators to find and correct weaknesses in their systems. System operators have important, legitimate reasons to attempt to circumvent such access control technologies to confirm the security of the password file or other vulnerable elements of the system. They must be able to use or create software that circumvents access control technologies to determine the robustness of the security system. * prevent computer users from protecting their privacy online by removing cookies from their computer. Additionally, if cookies are used as a copyright protection system it would be unlawful to manufacture a device that removes the cookie from the system. Section 1202: Allows for the collection of personally identifiable information as part of the Copyright Management System. This section will: * allow content owners to collect personally- identifiable information about users who access their copyrighted works. This will eliminate anonymous reading and allow content owners to track not only which online magazines you buy but also which articles you read and which pictures you look at. Section 201: Encourages system operators to violate the privacy and protected speech rights of their users. This section will: * exempt service providers from liability if they disable access to or remove material claimed to be infringing, regardless of whether the material or activity is ultimately determined to be infringing. This encourages them to remove potentially protected speech without any real proof of infringement. It also * allow OSPs to violate users privacy by sifting through customers' electronic files, documents and e-mail looking for a potential infringements. **ALTERNATIVE: SUPPORT H.R. 3048** A much better WIPO treaty implementation bill, which punishes the *act* of unlawful infringement and maintains privacy protections, is H.R. 3048, the "Digital Era Copyright Enhancement Act." H.R. 3048 would encourage the development of new technologies and markets for copyrighted works in digital form, and give intellectual property holders the strong tools they need to go after infringing conduct while protecting privacy, security, and anonymity. _________________________________________________________________ > If you are unsure who your legislators are or how to contact them, see > the EFF Congress Contact Factsheet at: http://www.eff.org/congress.html > <http://www.eff.org/congress.html> END OF ALERT (edited by BDH) ====================================================================== Betty Dawn Hamilton,LRS * mailto:bhamilt@llano.net Librarian * Tenet Master Trainer * News Group Moderator LM_NET Internet Volunteer * Freelance Writer/Editor TEXAS LIBRARY JOURNAL Contributing Editor 911 E. Oak St., Brownfield, Texas 79316 http://www.angelfire.com/tx/bhamilt =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= To quit LM_NET (or set NOMAIL or DIGEST), Send an email message to listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST * NOTE: Please allow time for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=