Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Here are some responses I received to my questions about Mandarin (no responses) and Athena and combining the catalogs for two libraries. Most were very happy with Athena and some thought Athena would allow us to keep 2 collections on one database. Most thought we should be cautious in doing that, however. Alexandria was suggested as an alternative choice by at least 2 responders. Thanks for your answers. I am an Athena user in a K-8 school. We have been very happy with it. Technical support is fairly good. Sometimes you have to wait for a call back, but they're usually pretty good about getting back to you quickly. They are very helpful. In the last ALA reports, Athena received the highest ratings of systems used in school libraries. We don't have a union catalog in our district, but I think you should seriously consider it. A true union catalog - not just a combined one as you described in the early part of your message. You are correct to wonder about doing an inventory with a combined catalog, unless there is some way to tell your system to only check ___ collection. Any union catalog you consider must be capable of differentiating between collections for inventory. And official interlibrary loan would be nice. We have recently purchased Athena. Athena allows you to develop different collections with their visual icons. You could purchase one program, develop a visual icon for each individual school's collection, and an icon for a union catalog. We are purchasing individual programs for each site to allow them to develop unique collections such as lists for Accelerated reader, etc. but we are purchasing the Web server for community access and will develop it as listed above. Good luck! We use the Surpass system (Humpress Group out of Florida) and we have a very similar setup. We have 2 libraries in one building which includes elementary and the middle/high school. We each have our own catalog which automatically comes up but there's a union catalog that only the librarians can access. This allows us to see the other collection when we need to. We borrow back and forth a lot. Wecan check books in and out for the other school. When adding a new copy, if the other library has it, we can copy for our records. It really works well. Actually we've had this system for 4 years now and I can't understand why more schools don't use it. I have no experience with the two systems you are considering, but I'm writing to suggest that you check out the Alexandria system before you make any final decisions. I'm a Teacher-librarian in a small country school (190 students). We now have a collection of close to 7,000 items. Had about 4,000 when we did the data entry. I automated our library four years ago using the Alexandria system from COMPanion Corporation. I became the district pilot and since then 12 other schools have automated with Alexandria. The system is totally integrated and it's very easy to move between the various components. I think the strongest thing about this system is how user friendly it is. Everyone is so uptight about automating until they see Alexandria in use. The company also has fantastic tech support. Help is available 7 days per week and 24 hours /day. They are wonderful and don't make you feel stupid when you're asking the dumbest questions. The other selling factor was that I could do the data entry on site using parent volunteers. We didn't even bother with the shelf list! They have an entry template for entering patrons and items. Brodart Precision one lets you load the Marc records. This system also does wonderful reports. I know that I only use a fraction of the ones available. You can determine what policies you want for your patrons and your material. I have different policies for each grade level as to the number of books they can have out, number of overdues and whether they can place something on hold. The great thing is you can change anything anytime and you can override and let the student take the book today, even though he's over his limit. It's all up to you. Anyway, I highly recommend that you look at this system! COMPanion has a web site at www.companioncorp.com I would keep your two collections separate. If your collections are in two different areas you need separate cirulation stations and search stations. Kid's Catalog is a wonderful search for the students in the younger grades! I use Athena, the multi-user program on Windows NT and Win95 interface. We have just switched over form Novell and win 3.1. there are some glitches but they are technical form our end not the program from what I can figure. I have used Nichols products for 6 years. First MOLLI and now Athena their windows version. I am very happy with the prgoam, the service and the potential for add-ons such as Webserver and Weblink. This connects your collection to the internet and allows you to add http addresses to the collection so searches can include internet resources. I would not buy two licenses. With Athena you can have more than one collection. I have many. AV equipment, Parent Collection, Science Equipment, Classroom Resources (Novel sets). The list could go on. You could have a collection with both sets of records and indicate the location of the resource in the location field. If you have any other specific questions I would be happy to answer them if I can. I do not know much about a union collection as we do not use this feature. It is possible form my sources. If you haven't done it yet ask for a demo copy of the program. http://www.nicholsinc.com/ I have a similar situation; I have a Judaic and Secular collection under one roof. What I am thinking to do is put a prefix of "J" in front of the call # for the Judaic. One thing I do know re. Athena is that they do not have room for more than 3 lines of Cat data in the computer readout, even though the labels can accomodate more. So, in a situation like mine where I have many uniform titles (Bibles, psalms, prayer books, etc.) I'd need to compress several fields on to one line. Ouch! We are a private school with two libraries on the same campus--pre-k thru 4 and 5-12. We have a union catalog and had always planned on having one when we were doing our automation planning. We use Circulation +. We have problems generating reports which are for the separate libraries and, although we have coordinated extremely closely, we have a few MARC categories which differ--but that's okay because that is what we use to generate our reports. On the student side, it has been terrific. The students, particularly 3-6, can have materials if one library doesn't have it and the other does. This has meant expanded resource capabilities and there has been an additional impact on coordinated Collection Development. We feel that it has been more than worth it. When we did it 4 years ago Follett told us that no one else was doing it so we had to struggle through problems which probably don't exist now. Bottom line: it works for us! Athena offers you the option of having more than one collection with one piece of software. You give different names to the collection, you can search each collection from the same workstation. Athena is easy to use, networkable, inexpensive! My tech person says it's the easiest software we have to use...... I use Athena at PCS, mainly because it has a great interface. The kids love the graphics and the move from card to automated catalog was really easy. It's also easy to create additional "catalogs" - I have one for the Library and one for Classroom Collections all on the same system. Students learn to check the location of an item, which is good preparation for using a union catalog in a public or academic library. I've discovered two problems with Athena: 1. multi-volume sets are cataloged as additional copies (e.g., we appear to have 26 copies of Collier's Encyclopedia, not 26 volumes); 2. reports are not customizable. Other than that, we're very happy with the system. We use MOLLI, Athena's DOS-based sibling, for our K-12 district of 750-or-so students. We have a K-6 building and a 7-12 building. While we are networked between buildings, we have two completely separate collections, which as it turns out are even on separate servers. Two advantages: --when I am posting records for new books or withdrawing books, only one campus loses access to the card catalog --when one system crashes (which does happen occasionally, in spite of my best efforts), it only affects one campus. We did make sure that no bar code numbers were duplicated between the two collections. That way books can be checked out as we do periodicals. My choice is Alexandria. It is available for both Windows and Macintosh. It has many unique features that I have not found in any other system. Patrons can check their status on any patron machines. Thus we do not use date due slips. They can also place a reservation or a hold on any book from their own computer. The circulation program keeps a listing for the entire day of the transactions that have been done. For example, if you have a student aide checking in and out books you can review what they have done easily and it also makes finding mistakes very easy. We use Athena and love it. Currently, all our collections are in one room but we plan to build new facilities. We use 4 different collections: Primary, Elementary, HS, and AV. Since it is in one location, we have only 1 license. If desired, we could also transfer all records into a Union catalog, but haven't taken the time to do that yet. Sarabeth Marcinko Turkey Run Elementary Marshall, Indiana marcinko@ticz.com =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= To quit LM_NET (or set NOMAIL or DIGEST), Send an email message to listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST * NOTE: Please allow time for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=