Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I've been asked to clarify the "wish list" I recently posted on Cataloguing Resources and, hopefully, this will explain what I am "wishing" for : Lead by the Library of Congress, the Cataloguing In Publication (CIP) program prints the recommended library cataloguing on much of what is published in North America, usually on the back of the title page. It seems to be fairly standard practice for many of the large publishers, although ones like Scholastic and other mass market paperback companies like Bantam, Dell, etc. don't don't seem to be involved, though, interestingly, Penguin does. I'm sure that there are guidelines on how it operates, etc. and this might explain why the lapses. And there are probably valid reasons why publishers don't want to participate - like, maybe, the time and additional expenses that it must involve. I've found samples of this on earlier British publications, so it seems that the program must have been in operation and then suspended for some reason. Why on earth would a librarian want this kind of information, unless he/she's too lazy to do the task? Frankly, the goal of a library should be to work with the patrons and CIP can provide some timesavers towards a recommended Dewey Decimal Number and Subject Headings. CIP, as any cataloguing, is not "The Correct Cataloguing", as some people seem to suggest, and the librarian must ultimately determine if the recommendations fit that particular library and its clients. In school libraries, there has been a growing trend over the years to include more and more of the school's resources through some centralized system, either a central collection or a central database. This means that while the school library might have originally had a volume of the "Diary of Anne Frank", it now has expanded to a videotape, a set of pictures, lesson aids, etc. Of course, I'd put on my wish list that everything help me to get more time with the people I serve, but educational publications, especially, should recognize the needs to optimize the librarian's time and provide cataloguing guides. A somewhat jaundiced view is that perhaps lesson aid publishers' view might be that they do not want a central depository within the school but, instead, that each teacher purchase additional copies. In my 30 years of experience, however, I've noted orders for publications increased when the teacher had access through the library. My main gripe lies with the educational groups, like the National Association of Secondary School Principals, the National Middle School Association, etc. who have continued to promote the library as a valued resource, yet fail to provide any CIP in their many, many publications. I'd like to think that they value each librarian's skills in organizing the school's collection and are confident that each librarian will be able to quickly identify the theme of each publication and translate that into a library's system of organization. I'd like to think that they are misguided to believe that each school library is so well staffed that the librarian has the time it takes to consider what cataloguing is required. Or I'd like to think that it is simply an oversight and someone has asked "Why aren't we giving these people some help in cataloguing?" But their own publications suggest that there are shortages of time that need to be made up, more librarians are needed, library's philosophical basis needs to be expanded, etc. So why, I ask, haven't these groups - and I target only 2 of many - considered and solved the issue? And, the third item, suggests that North America is, at least, attempting to remedy the problem. The British National Library statement (cataloguing is available from the British National Library) is quite probably true. But, in North America I can get the item to the client quickly because that cataloguing is available immediately within it. Or, now with the Internet, I can access the information fairly quickly with a user-friendly webpage. Take a look at the BNL page. I did, a number of times, since the items here tend to be British publications and, in trying to catalog (manually!) some 25,000 items, I can get stuck on some. The page is, indeed, a true nightmare with an initial page of selecting, it seems, where the item might be within their collections before you even attempt a search. Now compare the Library of Congress various sites. You'll note that the search is usually cross-collectioned, simple and logical (well, most often, though they're still not userfriendly with names having initials, etc.). Fortunately, the limited number of other national sites I've accessed in Europe, seem to take the LC approach. And, finally, international schools often order from the United States and Britain. While cataloguing this school's collection, I've noted the same volume has been purchased from both those suppliers. The American one will have the cataloguing in publication, the British will have the BNL statement. The most recent one I noticed had HarperCollins as the publisher, though I'm afraid I can not recall which title. Are we, in fact, facing some "national standards" when the publisher decides what to print? Perhaps. Yet I posted a query if there were differences in attitudes towards school librarians/school libraries in Britain and North America and got back an overwhelming response that, indeed, they were. Perhaps somewhat of an oversimplification, but the British tended to suggest that their librarians and libraries were to serve the needs of the classroom teacher while the North Americans tended to suggest that theirs was to work with the classroom teacher. Quite a telling difference in light of cataloguing and, perhaps, the underlying reason for such a difference between British and American publishers and library services. So, a rather long response that I hope clarifies the "wish list" on LM_Net. Sometimes, when I'm old(er) and grey(er), I'll have time to explore it more. Nah, I'd rather play golf..... Earl Earl Sande Secondary School Librarian International School of Tanganyika Post Office Box 2651 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (e-mail : sandes@wilken-dsm.com) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 3) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=