Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
As a former English teacher-now librarian, I've been there. My opinion only: Depending upon what was instructed by the teacher and what the student actually did, I would not know how to respond. If the teacher had spent time discussing and instructing how to take notes, how to cite sources, and how to prepare the bibliography page, then this is certainly a situation in which the student did not fulfill his requirements. If, however, the science teacher assumed that the student knew how to do all of this (perhaps by merely consulting the English teacher), then I feel that the student should receive partial credit for his work but that the teacher should inform the student of how the work needed to be correctly written. Sometimes students (at this age) assume that if they just list the sources at the end of the page then they are fine. (I've had this occur.) Many students still do not understand the importance of citing "correctly"--using MLA or Turabian styles. Perhaps the teacher is making a "stern" lesson which will ultimately reflect in English, science, and across the curriculum--which I commend the teacher for attempting--but will the student learn from this experience? (I can remember serious infractions made in school that have stayed with me throughout my life--spelling or grammatical errors that resulted in a "0" regardless of the wonderful paper topic. Did I remember the errors? Yes, but I still feel that perhaps some teachers get hung-up on the wrong lessons.) Is it plagiarism? I don't think the intent was there to deceive but to compile the material in some type of a format that would be "acceptable" and fulfill the requirements of the assignment. Unfortunately the student did not follow instructions (whether they were spoken or implied) and will not receive full credit for the work. If there had been a rubric which included what part of the assignment would receive points--content 20%, correct citing of information 15%, etc.--then there might have been a "happy medium" for all concerned. This was an example of "throwing the baby out with the bath water." Unfortunately everyone lost in this attempt to teach in two curriculum areas. Shonda Brisco LMS Oklahoma School for the Blind bso@ok.azalea.net cowboys@ok.azalea.net =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=