Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Friends, The thought took shape in a dream, this morning. In that dream, the family had found itself stretched across a crowded place, while endeavoring to get to a specific destination, and with less than adequate means for us--or those around us, it seemed--to easily and efficiently get to our specific, individual destinations, together. And while we jostled about, together, striving to find our disparate ways, a sign was vocally noted by one thankfully thoughtful observer--a sign which announced, with quiet (if shrill), authoritarian zeal: "NO UNNECESSARY TALKING." Most of us in that crowd had been rather subdued, as it was. Few had observed, or consciously noted, the sign. Anxiously focused on our own ways, not many were choosing to chat across the aisles, as it was. And it was really only after that wag had astutely suggested how absurdly presumptuous the sign's message was, that we noted, first, how very quiet we were being, and that we started, second, to talk... . Just what IS unnecessary talking? And who presumes, with the actual purpose and plausible result of healthful helpfulness, to decide FOR us, when--and what--communication might be necessary and beneficial, for each of the individuals crowded into this world, on the way to our disparate destinations? Our right to remain silent has been (in many cases grudgingly) acknowledged. What about our right to give voice? The point? And specific to the LM_NET forum? Recently, we touched on the practice and practicality of noise traffic lights in school cafeterias. And here, in the past week, some have questioned not whether, but HOW we might seemingly--and successfully--eliminate, but not censor, "unnecessary," inaccurate and unhelpful web sites. (And, understanding the point, we would perhaps each LIKE to help and agree with this endeavor, in many of its aspects.) Meantime, some suggest there are too many, or not enough, of a given type or variety of literature, available. And an appeal is made to have more, or less, made available, depending on individual needs, perspectives and observations. Others make a perhaps questionable case as to their justification for ordering when, where, how, why, and even WHAT others will, and will not, READ. Some inquire about how (as if) we might finally succeed in eliminating the hassles associated with missing or overdue materials. Then, when others dare (?) frankly suggest that the practiced pseudo-solution of routinely punitively suppressing borrowers often equates to throwing the baby out with the bath water, some few may be observed to quickly ORDER, with observably neither the right, the authority, nor the sensibility to do so, that the very communication of the SUGGESTION somehow represents unnecessary, and even offensively unacceptable, chatter. And so they then understandably claim it to therefore be their right to abusively order the messenger to learn to stay mute, for having seemingly been so presumptuously out of line; for simply having dared to speak--to share an alternative view! What IS unnecessary talking, if I may (rhetorically) ask? And who properly and respectfully decides this, for us? Please. I find it necessary to have this examined, and perhaps understood, once and for all. (Now THERE's irony for you!) Thanks! Take care. JEK ***** Shutting up ought not be shutting down. Jeffrey E. Kirkpatrick Present Occupation: Self employed at freely sharing (in Aurora, CO) e-mail address: jeffkirk@sni.net =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 3) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=