Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
The Abridged Dewey is starting to use longer numbers too. I checked our files and, in the numbers that we have used, there are a few 4 digit numbers to the right of the decimal point, and one 6 digit number. If labels are being printed from the opac, maybe there is an overlooked option to print the number LC classification style in there, or a vendor might be able to print the labels that way, if requested. Dan Robinson Indexing Services H.W. Wilson Company Bronx, NY drobinson@hwwilson.com On 8 Sep 99 at 8:57, Carol Simpson wrote: > >>> Penny McAllister <PMcalli718@AOL.COM> 09/08 6:32 AM >>> > > Have the label be 3 lines long with the main number on top, the decimal in > the middle, and the cutter on the bottom. While numbers with longer = > decimal > places than 3 digits are still a problem, they are still easier to get in > order by the first three places of the decimal..... > > 598 629 398 599 > .2 .123 .2 .79 > Wex Bar Gri Lam > > > This has been the convention for libraries using LC classification for a = > long time. I've always wondered why Dewey libraries haven't followed suit. = > Of course, those who use ABRIDGED Dewey generally don't have many very = > long numbers anyway. > > > Dr. Carol Simpson =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=