Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
My first reaction to this situation is that NO librarian can possibly keep up with all the changes being made to website materials, so for an administrator (or any person) to ask that the librarian not purchase any books with URLs in them is a bit unreasonable. There are many textbooks, as well as recreational reading, that offer website addresses to "learn more about the subject" covered in a book or a chapter. Because many websites are placed on the web with advertisements (see Britannica's example), it seems unlikely that all URLs will be kept "clean and pure" for children. As a parent, I understand the situation; however, parental supervision is obviously the primary responsibility here. If a book is objectionable, libraries have proper procedures in place to handle these situations when a parent complains. However, because libraries are completely intertwined between paper and electronic formats, it seems that parents and administrators still want "someone" to be responsible for the actions of others who are providing controversial materials throughout our electronic educational mediums. "Throwing the baby out with the bath water" is my opinion of not purchasing materials with URLs in them. If reviewing every item that provides a URL isn't wasting enough of your time, then perhaps checking back each month to evaluate who has "sold out to whom...." or "become involved in a corporate merger" and have changed their webpages to reflect such changes, will definitely drive you crazy! Perhaps providing students and their parents with courses in evaluating websites and how to determine what is good or bad when surfing the Net is a better tactic. In addition, providing parents with information about the changing world of the Web, as well as ways to help their children find and use materials that are good for them is the best way to put the responsibility back where it belongs....with the parents. If all else fails, providing a "warning label" on compilations of websites (books that are resources to resources on the Web) may be the only way to make everyone happy without eliminating the educational medium that we are now involved with daily. Become proactive in this situation and make it a learning experience for everyone. Make sure that everyone realizes that in today's changing electronic formats that you cannot (nor will you ever be able to) keep up with what things are being made available on the Web. However, eliminating anything associated with it will only hinder the education process for everyone involved. There is a better way when we all work together! I hope you can find it! Good luck! Shonda Brisco Assistant Professor Mary L. Williams Curriculum Materials Library Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK bshonda@okstate.edu =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=