Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I just heard on the news that the New York Times has created a Children's Best Seller List. Why? To get Harry Potter off the list. This week the books are in 3rd, 4th, and 12th place. After next week, The Goblet of Fire would have been #1. They didn't think it was fair that "children's" books should take up so many slots on the best seller list. They did say that they thought it might help children's books, but I for one don't like it. If they had wanted to make a children's best seller list for a good reason, I would have agreed, but I don't agree with it just to get Harry off the list. Muggles for Harry Potter!! Gail Gail Shea Grainger Librarian, Chesterfield School, Chesterfield, NH Visit my Dewey Browse Web site by Dewey Classification http://www.sau29.k12.nh.us/library/Dewey/dewey_browse_2.html gail.grainger@top.monad.net ICONnect Task Force =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=