Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Below are the responses I received to my query: Does anyone know what "common knowledge" in terms of copyright and citing sources means? Does it refer to information generally known by the average person or to information found in most sources and not unique to a specific source? We are working on a research/copyright/plagiarism guide booklet and need clarification of the term. We want to define what is meant by the necessity of citing all information that is not "common knowledge". Thanks to everyone who offered help. Sandy ################################ What is common knowledge in copyright terms is not easy to define. Such things as 2+2=4 is common knowledge. So is the fact that George Washington was the 1st president of the US or the fact that we have 50 states. In copyright terms, facts can't be copyrighted anyway, only the expression of those facts if there is some modicum of creativity therein. ################################ I tell the students that common knowledge is what they find in the general encyclopedia. ################################ A lot of what you ask varies with the grade you are teaching. But in general, a student will link together several pieces of information about their subject from a source. I'd use the rule of thumb that when they stop with a source, or change paragraphs, they need to cite. If they got the information from a book, then they need to cite. ################################ My understanding is that common knowledge is basic stuff one would not necessarily learn from written sources, e.g., the sun rises in the east. I would check MLA or some other authority, however, rather than rely on our collective "common knowledge." You just might end up with "common opinion" instead. ################################ I may be wrong but I agree with what you are saying. However, the rule of thumb I was told in school was that if the information is in at least three sources (different authors), then it is considered common knowledge. ################################ You may want to try some of the copyright websites for clarification. My understanding is that common knowledge refers to things like the 12 inches on a ruler. The Library of Congress site linking to copyright is www.loc.gov and states the following: "Works consisting entirely of information that is common property and containing no original authorship (for example: standard calendars, height and weight charts, tape measures and rulers, and lists or tables" ################################ You're exactly correct. If an author states something in a writing to prove his point, but it's something that the average person would know, the writer using his material soes not need to give credit to him. However, if the point the author is making is unique, then citing is necessary- for either a paraphrase or a direct quote. ################################ I just visited Purdue University's Online Writing Lab, OWL. They suggest that in "Deciding if something is 'common knowledge'" It probably is IF: "You find the same information undocumented in at least five other sources. You think it is information that your readers will already know. You think a person could easily find the information with general reference sources." ################################ You more than likely already have your answer, but, if you do not,.... I have been doing some research for our own copyright and plagiarism standards at CHS and one of the sources that was given to me defines "What is common knowledge?" "Common knowledge: facts that can be found in numerous places and are likely to be known by a lot of people Example: John F Kennedy was elected President of the United States in 1960. This is generally known information. You do not need to document this fact. However, you must document facts that are not generally known and ideas that interpret facts." (Taken from Plagiarism: What It Is and How to Recognize and Avoid It; www.indiana.edu/~wts/plagiarism.html, 3/1/2000.) ################################ Sandra Eichelberger, LMS West Seneca East Senior High School West Seneca, NY 14224 eichel@buffnet.net (home) seichel@westseneca.wnyric.org (school) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.html See also EL-Announce for announcements from library media vendors: http://www.mindspring.com/~el-announce/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=