Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I've encountered a situation I haven't dealt with yet, and would like to know if any of you have experienced this. Several years ago I was asked to purchase materials on literary criticism for our English Dept. I went with a Gale series with two volume sets dealing with poetry, drama, short stories, novels and Shakespeare. The titles were Poetry for Students, etc. Two teachers used them, thought they were great and thanked me. Those people are gone and this year we have a long time teacher teaching English for the first time in I don't know how long. Let me say here that I respect much of the work she does. In the fall she checked all but the Shakespeare titles from the sets listed above. I thought she was using them to prepare... great. Several times during the year I noticed they were still gone, usually when I wanted to use them. Yesterday the speech coach, who wanted to use them with her kids, expressed her frustration with not having access to those books, and my aide told me that the English teacher was keeping them in her room so the kids WOULDN'T be able to use them. The books contain many of the literary works that this teacher uses in two courses, and she thinks they'll read those analyses rather than the originals. She's also concerned that the kids will pull from the reference sources when asked to do their own analyses. I'm upset that a teacher essentially weeded something from the collection I am responsible for, behind my back, but more important, these are valuable resources that were bought for kids to use. Shouldn't the references be used as models to show how analysis is done? Couldn't she modify her assignments so that it wouldn't be feasible to copy from the books? My reaction to her was that she would surely recognize student responses that plagiarized those books. I pointed out to her that the students could easily find similar resources on the web. Have any of you run into a similar situation? It's my impression that works on literary criticism are standard elements of a good collection. She and my principal have suggested that I put the sets where the students won't have access to them. I find that unacceptable. I'm looking forward to your responses, Marsha Marsha Hauser Media Specialist Ed-Co Schools, Edgewood, Iowa mhauser@edge-cole.k12.ia.us =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.html See also EL-Announce for announcements from library media vendors: http://www.mindspring.com/~el-announce/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=