Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Many thanks to all of you who shared your views of the copy/paste method for taking notes when using Internet resources. You have convinced me to give this method a fair shake as I begin a year-long action research project on this topic. Your instructional strategies are great and give me reasons to make changes in my own lessons! Here is my original question, followed by the author's response and then your responses. Enjoy! Jan Landes, librarian Hinkletown Mennonite School 272 Wanner Rd. Ephrata, PA 17522 jrlandes@ptd.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "My question should be of interest to anyone who tries to teach students ways to avoid plagiarizing. I am a school librarian (K-8) who trys to teach my students how to do research with integrity. With the wonderful resources now available to them via the Internet, I am challenged to give them tools that help them synthesize what they find while in cyberspace. In preparing for a class I am taking this summer on integrated literacy I came across some alarming advice in Ryder and Graves' book "Reading and Learning in Content Areas," (1998). In the chapter on 'Technology and Literacy' I was shocked to hear them instruct the reader to teach a 'copy and paste' technique for note taking. They suggest that the researcher creates a page in their word processor where they then paste text from the Internet resource and add their own anecdotal comments. They refer to this as "easy to learn, involves little effort, [isn't that why people plagiarize?] and results in a product that is permanent and easily reproduced.... the user can then generate a written summary of important points." Is it just me or does this strike anyone else as a direct pathway to plagiarism? I think it is meant to replace the highlighting process that students use with books and journal articles and to save paper. I'm doing a presentation to my classmates next week and will be challenging this process suggested by Ryder and Graves. I'd appreciate any comments from you on this suggested practice, pro or con, and also, how do you teach notetaking in cyberspace? I have always had students print out copies of what they are going to use and then highlight and take notes. I will continue to promote that practice unless you guys give me some better suggestions that don't lead to plagiarism. Suggested sites and resources are welcome on this topic." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Here is Randall Ryder's response, author of "Reading and Learning in the Content Areas"/Second Edition/by Randall J. Ryder and Michael F. Graves/New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,1998 (3rd edition due out this fall) : "Thank you for the inquiry. You raise a valid point regarding plagiarism. Let me explain my thoughts on the matter. Given that many students devote a lot of time copying information in print to their personal notes I believe the process of copying and pasting from hypertext reduces the amount of time devoted to this process. As they are personal notes used for educational purposes this process does not involve violation of copyright or plagiarism. If students now use this information for the purpose of writing a paper or perhaps answering questions for an assignment or quiz that will be submitted to the teacher and graded, then the issue of intellectual property must be raised. When writing that section it was my intent that we use technology as a scribe, thus allowing students more time to distill, synthesize, evaluate, and apply the information they acquired. It is also important that they write summaries or engage in other writing activities that will allow them to go beyond the reproduction of information obtained from text sources. I have emphasized this process thoroughly in the third edition of the book which should be available this fall. Thanks for sharing your concerns." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ LM_NETers' comments: "I agree with you on the copy and paste things and all my first -6th graders KNOW!! I started off with telling all grades about the word Plagiarism and how it came from the Latin: meaning "to kidnap". They REALLY remember that...and I repeat what I teach or question their rememberance much during the year. I do teach notetaking from the examples on the BIG 6 lesson plans and this year when second graders were studying butterflies and we went on the Internet they knew they had to RCW read....R close (that's for books...but for the internet we changed it to R-remember instead of C-close (the book) and W- write... They would read a small paragraph...go out and write what they remember on their paper...and then record it on a butterfly in correct spelling, etc. Of course, at that age they can't do anything too elaborate but it was small but a great step toward learning about plagiarism. I think you need to preach, preach, preach and then if someone does copy: really show how you know it's not their words and it needed to be in quotes..It is hard to teach that the word(s) that is/are the Main fact(s) have to stay the same... Hope you do well.....maybe you can use the Kidnap word to capture them...." Kathleen Shepoka -Media Specialist-Pawnee Elementary ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Electronic note taking is here to stay but there are best practices as in anything. I too believe the quick and easy way copy and paste is promoted as note taking by many is a path to making plagiarism a habit. The kids see it as condoned by teachers as well, and are quick to say what teacher taught them to do that. I urge people if they cut and paste, to cut and paste it directly into a set of quotation marks and to note the source info including the website (cut and paste that, too) immediately following the quote. Then separately add annotation, reflection, reaction for pesonal record but in a way that can be identified as not source material. You have touched on the heart of a growing problem." Paula Brown, Librarian CFS The School at Church Farm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I have to say that I would agree with Ryder and Graves. To ask a researcher to change digital content to analog content and the rekey it as digital content to me seems unnecessary. When doing research as an adult, I certainly don't do that. Students can still plagiarize when using the write-it-down method - it just takes a little longer! We need to be teaching techniques like changing the color of the text of directly copies materials to indicated a direct quote, how to cite electronic sources, and just plain what is allowable and what is not. The real key to preventing plagiarism is in designing good assignments that ask for personal, critical solutions to problems. For what it's worth......." Doug Johnson Director of Media and Technology I.S.D. 77, Mankato Public Schools Box 8713, Mankato MN 56002-8713 Voice: 507-387-7698, Fax: 507-387-2496 E-mail: dougj@doug-johnson.com Web: www.doug-johnson.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I had never heard of Ryder and Graves until you wrote your email BUT I had gotten tired of the kids printing out complete articles, highlighting important parts, and writing them directly into their papers. My solution was to teach them to cut and paste to the notepad .... just words and phrases that would remind them of what they had read ... if they forgot... they had the URL and could go back to the article to refresh their minds. I always printed out the articles and highlighted but when I sat down to write my papers (English teacher's nightmare) ... I wrote my final draft, period. I wrote from my memory of what I had read and added my thoughts. I would go back to my information only to get statistics or quotes that I wanted to include. Most students don't even consider using their memories for any part of the process. Thus I decided that we weren't going to print out the articles ... we were going to read them and take words and phrases that would help us remember. The sixth graders have a sheet of paper with the place to do their works cited at the top and lines underneath. They don't even get to use the computer to copy/paste. (A very short project so this works well as a first learning experience.) Each source they use is on a different piece of paper. Notetaking is also graded. They then code each paper as to what the "subject" is about to organize their project. Again it is short so this is a workable procedure for them. There are students who try to copy/paste paragraphs, articles, etc but they are stopped at the printer. Follow directions, do again. If the teacher wants to use the notecard method the students then transfer their copy/paste info to notecards. (or they have the option of taking their notecards to the computer and doing them directly there) I think it all depends on the way in which the copy/paste is done. What we're doing is just having the same words/phrases that the student would write on their notecard ... done to the notepad. No sentences are permitted. Short, sweet, and to the point. If you ever get the chance to hear Alice Yucht speak about teaching notetaking. She's great! I heard her at AASL and she had some good ideas!" Jo Anne Collins, L/MS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I tend to lean toward your side of the arguement... I think students need to read the material and not do a copy / paste,unless they are using a direct quote for the paper itself. I teach a course to freshmen at a local private college in freshmen orientation (study skills) and Library orientation. It is required of all students. In my sections of the course, I have a night (one class period) on plagiarism, and understanding what it is, and what is considered acceptable practice. Here are some web sites which might be helpful to you in this endeavor.... <http://bedfordstmartins.com/technotes/techtiparchive/ttip102401.htm> (Thinking and talking about Plagiarism) It has a great bibliography...please make sure you see PREVENTING ACADEMIC DISHONESTY ( by Barbara Gross Davis) <http://uga.berkley.edu/sled/bdg/prevent.html> Seven Anectdots to Prevent Highway Robbery in the Electronic Age <http://fno.org/may98/cov98may.html> Anti-Plagiarism Strategies for Research Papers (my students find these techniques very useful) <http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm> The general thought on plagiarism today is to teach it as a good writing and source management technique. We need to teach these techniques, and like you, I do not agree with the technique that is recommended in your text. There are a lot of ONLINE WRITING CENTERS at colleges and universities which might help you in this pursuit (teaching the note taking from a management standpoint)...try Purdue University Online Writing Lab <http;//owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/print/reserach/r_plagiar.htm> in addition to clearly stating what needs to be given "credit" or documentation....it has some exercises for practice. paraphrasing, which is HIGHLY POSSIBLE from the technique listed in the book you cited....is also considered plagiarism by definition (use of another's ideas) see AVOIDING two common forms of accidental plagiarism and Example of acceptable paraphrase at Northwestern Univeristy's Online Writing Lab <http://www.writing.nwu.edu/tips/plag.html>" Michael Brocato Edward Hynes Elem School Teacher-Librarian New Orleans, LA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Copy and paste is also a suggested method of note-taking by the Big 6. I agree with you in part, but to have students print everything they think they might use is not very cost effective for most of us. Not only is it paper, but also printer ink. Then again we do not all have enough computers to allow students to sit at one for the length of time it takes them to read through something and either write notes or copy and paste. I think that the copy and paste method might be a good idea if: 1. They copy the URL onto the document, and all citation info, just as they would on note cards. 2. They place in quotes what is copied verbatim, so they know later on that it is a verbatim quote 3. They double space, so that they can, if necessary, paraphrase underneath. Of course, all of this takes up computer time, once again. However, when we used to make notecards for research paper, how much of what we wrote was copied? Does it make any difference that we handwrote it? No, it just took longer to do! So, there are my 2 cents." Sharon Gonzalez Librarian Connell Middle School San Antonio, TX sgonzalez3@satx.rr.com sgonzalez@saisd.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I found all too often that there was confusion about notetaking, with teachers expecting that students "should already know" how to do it. Students need to be taught the basic skills first, what to select from any document. Forget higher level thinking at first, just get them to find the color of an orange. Then show them how to transfer that to their notes. Add information on where they found it. Then get them to write a sentence on what they have found. Next, add the next level of thinking, etc. Realize that often student plagiarize because they have never been taught what to do and why they are doing it. (Yes, of course, there are the others). Highlighting a document looks like something is being achieved, so does cut-and-paste. But we need to be sure that the students actually know notetaking skills, before we assume they can apply the information. Personally, I still like the 3X5 card method. Have them divide the card into 2 or 3 sections : one will be to write their note, one for identifying the source. The cards later can be sorted into a sequence from which they write their paragraphs, essay, etc. (Card 1) Color : orange or green. (Card 2) Weight : 2 lbs (Card 3) Inside is ..... and so on MUST come before the Symbolism of Oranges in Gone With The Wind. A final note : be sure the student has enough time to complete the lessons. Often teachers give it a "one shot" approach, with the students being faced with constant demands for originality instead of taking the time to do his/her own work." Earl Sande Semi-retired International School Librarian 10189 133 Street Surrey, BC V3T3Y8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "In Western Australia, we are suggesting copy-and-paste, then write up the answer to their question. The students set up their document in two columns: Left - for copying Right - for their own words We also suggest that students should copy and paste the url, title, author of the material they use. If teachers set this up with questions that require some student thought, it should be quite obvious from the finished sheet as to how the students make use of the text that they have copied. We have some examples and proformas that teachers can use at: <http://www.eddept.wa.edu.au/cmis/eval/pd/pd91.htm> The simplest proforma is a word document: <http://www.eddept.wa.edu.au/cmis/eval/pd/copyright/HO22.doc> I know suggesting copy-and-paste sound like a bad idea, but doing it this way, students will be learning that they only get credit for what they do with the material that they copy, and that the simple act of copying isn't sufficient by itself." Jill Midolo, Editor Technology Focus and CMIS Evaluation Website CMIS (Curriculum Materials Information Services) Department of Education Western Australia 151 Royal Street East Perth WA 6004 Ph: (08) 9264 4192 Fax: (08) 9264 5708 Email: mailto:jill.midolo@eddept.wa.edu.au Website: http://www.eddept.wa.edu.au/cmis/eval/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "You are right on target. I couldn't agree with you more...this idea is simply bad. Now, the only way to avoid plagiarism is when the teacher creates the assignment. Only when the student must do something with the information gathered; i.e., use his own head to come up with thoughts that are supported or refuted by what has been located as "reference search" will it become impossible to copy and paste. It works every time, but how do we get our classroom teachers to be willing to change? In these days of using rubrics it becomes a mite easier, but the teacher still can't just copy and paste other people's ideas per se either. Hilda L. Jay, LMS(Ret.) & Author Collington Cottage 2108 10450 Lottsford Road Bowie, MD 20721 hlj002@ns1.wmdc.edu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Interesting. I try to keep the students from printing out entire web sites - they're not going to read 35 pages of text! I try to encourage them to scan through what the web site has and then copy and paste everything they think they might need to a notebook page. The FIRST thing they are supposed to copy and paste is the web address - so they know where the information came from for their bibliography and in case they do need to go back to get more information. After they have copied and pasted information from a couple of sources, THEN they are supposed to rewrite a compilation of the information they have gathered for their report. They are not supposed to copy and paste and hand it in as their report..." Mary Ann Shaffer Media Specialist Carver Middle School Orlando, FL shaffermas@aol.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I also teach my 4th and 5th grade students to copy and paste from web pages, always carefully copying the title of the webpage, url, and author, if given. I teach them to only copy and paste keywords (just as they would if taking notes from an encyclopedia, book, or other print resource). I can't see how this promotes plagiarism...we have thorough discussions of just what plagiarism is and how important it is to paraphrase and cite sources to avoid plagiarism. Copying and pasting is basically just note-taking; whether or not a researcher plagiarizes isn't going to be mandated by the manner of the note-taking but rather by the integrity of the researcher." Linda Miller, Teacher-Librarian San Antonio, Texas ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I,too, work hard to teach my kids to avoid plagiarism. I agree with you that the book's suggestion is just inviting plagiarism to happen. I think a lot of kids plagiarize because they haven't been taught how to take the information and put it in their own words. The best thing I've done is use graphic organizers for kids to take notes. With 5th graders, we used a data collection chart to take notes for their reports about famous black Americans. Categories included: date of birth, education, family, accomplishments, etc. The boxes on the data chart were small so they couldn't copy the whole sentence-just the important facts. The kids then use the data sheets to write reports--they DO NOT sit with an open encyclopedia in front of them! We also did a 30-min. plagiarism exercise and talked about just changing around a couple of words in a sentence is still plagiarism. I have a neat worksheet that discusses plagiarism, then gives a sample paragraph and a list of statements--the students decide whether or not the statements are plagiarism. It really made them aware! For 4th grade state reports, we again used a graphic organizer to collect data, which eliminates the problem of copying whole sentences. I have also heard good things about the "Trash 'n Treasure" notetaking method as a way to teach kids notetaking skills. This summer I purchased a book for our staff--can't remember the exact title now, something like Cheating & Plagiarism in the Internet Era. I just received it this week and spent about 5 min. perusing it--it looks fabulous. Good luck on this endeavor!" Amy Brownlee School Library Media Specialist K-12 Sterling, Kansas ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "The main thing I would say regarding your concerns about plagiarism with copying and pasting is that unless that is the only work the students are doing as they collect information, I don't think it should be an issue. Some advantages of the copy and paste method (as I see it) - students have the exact words from their original source when they need to quote their source - students know where their information came from when they write "According to A. Alvarez, Sylvia Plath's poetry...." - teachers can see exactly what information the students gathered, and from what source _to ensure that they are not plagiarizing_ if students turn in their notes with their finished project, there will be little question whether they have copied something word for word. Likewise, it will make it easier for a teacher to detect whether a student has just changed the order of the words or whether they have truly synthesized the information they collected. I work with a ninth grade teacher who is teaching her students how to do a research paper, and she has them copy information word for word from their print sources too so that they have everything they need when they are doing their final project. The above reasons are why she does this for all resources. At first, I was a little taken aback, but at this point, I think I understand why she does it, and it does seem to cut down on plagiarism for her." Kimberly A. Brosan, Librarian Mid-Carolina High School, SC kim@bigbadwolf.org <mailto:kim@bigbadwolf.org> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "There is nothing wrong with copying, highlighting, pasting, etc. as long as the assignment goes further than that. The assignment from the teacher should force the student to use the copied text in a completely new way so that the student has to write about what is in the text. For example: Read a biography. Copy or notetake 20 facts about the person you are reading about. Now the assignment is to create an interview with that person. You be Barbara Walters and write questions that will pull these answers together in an entertaining way. Or read all about motorcycles. Using the information you have found discuss which motorcycle would be the best one for Johnny who wants to ride across the country without getting killed and tell why it is the best. Include places to stay overnight and what to do when the weather turns ugly. It is the librarian's job to help the teacher come up with creative writing assignments so that plagiarism is not an issue. Kids don't want to plagiarise, but what they read sounds better than what they can write. If the format of the assignment is changed, then their writing style sounds just fine to them." Joan Edwards Library Media Teacher Sycamore Junior High School Anaheim, California libedw@hotmail.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Jan, I agree with you 100%. I am a ninth grade English teacher and MLIS student. I wage a constant battle against "copy / paste." (Last year, I had two students copy paste their entire research paper; one student copy pasted complete with hyperlinks!) I encourage the students to read the article online. If it is an article they think they will use, then print it out; if they think they might use the article, I have them create a page of hyperlinks and annotations, so they can go back to the article. I also require my students to turn in their articles with their papers. Our school media specialist encourages students to print their articles. She does not encourage copy pasting." Molly Bates ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "One of the best resources on this topic is a recent publication by Ann Lathrop and Katherine Foss titled Student Cheating and Plagiarism in the Internet Era. (Libraries Unlimited, 2000). They have a chapter on strategies teachers and LMS can use to avoid the plagiarism problem from the beginning of a project. Two suggestions I believe make great sense: 1) Work with students in the early stages of a project or a paper so they develop research questions that reflect higher level thinking 2) Assess process as well as product and do that throughout the process not just at the end. I also like the T-chart approach to note taking that Marilyn Joyce and Julie Tallman include in their book on the I-Search process. Make a big "t" on a sheet of paper -- or in a word processing document. The left column is to be used to record the bibliographic citation and the most important points from a resource. The right column is to be used for the student's reflective thoughts on the reading. In other words: why this information was important, how it relates to another piece of information, how it relates to the research question, etc. If done correctly, that right-hand column can provide much of the new knowledge that needs to go into a paper." Marjorie L. Pappas, Ph. D. Eastern Kentucky University Library Science Richmond, KY marjorie.pappas@eku.edu mlpappas38@aol.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I fully concur with you, though I've not see the book to which you refer. I am giving a workshop in our System in October and plan on talking about the cut/paste idea. The method surely shortens the process of making/taking notes but also surely encourages plagiarism. While not stifling technology, we need to emphasize the synthesizing process. Not just mentioning the term "synthesizing" but starting with topics of known "knowledge" like a paragraph about interacting with friends, and having the students synthesize that, then proceed to information that builds their knowledge by synthesizing paragraphs when they understand the concepts well enough to put it in their own words." Harry Willems, Assistant Director SEKLS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "I have no problem with the copy and paste process as long as the source is included with the information. The teachers I work with require complete bibliographies and works cited. They will not accept uncited information. Jill Brown, LMS Nardin Academy Buffalo, NY buflib@yahoo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST, etc.) send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml See also EL-Announce for announcements from library media vendors: http://www.mindspring.com/~el-announce/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=