Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
These were part of a recent issue of the Educause listserv. Big Brother's next stop may be school libraries. Ellen Nosal. MLS East Hampton High School East Hampton, CT enosal@msn.com SOME LIBRARIES OPT FOR NO FILTERS, NO FEDERAL FUNDING Many San Francisco Bay Area libraries remain opposed to installing Internet filters, despite Monday's Supreme Court ruling that ties some federal funding to installing filters. Some librarians questions the efficacy of filters, noting that often they do not successfully block X-rated content but can block access to age-appropriate medical and sexual information. The portion of funding that some libraries receive from the federal government is relatively small, and many libraries wish to avoid the cost and hassle of installing filters and to continue to offer patrons access to all information. Susan Gallinger, director of the Livermore Public Library, said, "We just don't feel we as librarians need to be in the position of telling people what they should read, see, or hear." Bay Area libraries are pursuing different approaches to protecting children from inappropriate content, from installing filters that block pornographic Web sites in the children's reading section but not in the adult area to issuing "smart cards" to children with Internet access authorized by their parents. San Jose Mercury News, 24 June 2003 http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/news/local/6158188.htm FILTER REQUIREMENT RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT BLOCKED-SITE LISTS Now that public libraries must install Internet filters or risk losing federal funds, companies that make filters may be forced to soften their position of not revealing what sites they block, according to Judith Krug, director of the American Library Association's (ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom. Krug said the ALA will encourage its members to choose only those filters whose makers agree to disclose their lists of blocked sites. Net Nanny, which does allow users to view and update its list of blocked sites, hopes to take advantage of the situation Krug described and have its software installed in many libraries. David Burt of N2H2, which keeps its list secret, said his company has invested millions of dollars in developing its list and believes keeping it private will not be a consideration for libraries newly installing filters. Of the institutions that have already installed N2H2 filters, Burt said, none has requested to see the list. Wall Street Journal, 24 June 2003 (sub. req'd) http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB105649238011074300,00.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archive: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml LM_NET Select/EL-Announce: http://www.cuenet.com/archive/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ven.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-