Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I don't know about the quality of various parts but since eMachine was bought by Dell (I may be wrong and it might have been Gateway, but I don't think so.) and the Dell execs replaced mostly by eMachine people, I don't know that there will be much difference. Carl Seale, Librarian -- Retired cbseale@sbcglobal.net http://www.hillsboro.net/business/antiquesandthings If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost. That is where they should be. Now put the foundation under them. --Henry David Thoreau Subject: Re: Looking for information about eMachine computers > Well...... > > You get what you pay for in some cases. <G> In reality, the computer > business exists on razor-thin profit margins. The reason that the > eMachines product is so much cheaper is that they are using less-rigorously > quality tested parts. Most hardware manufacturers sell two to three > quality lines of the same product...chips, power supplies, switches, > etc. I stress that these parts are all from the same assembly line, all > the same product design. The difference is in the quality control. The > cheapest line is often not tested at all for quality, or only at a minimal > level, say 1 in 1000 tested. They will likely have a greater percentage of > faulty parts.. The mid-line price applies to the units that are checked at > a higher level, say one in every 100 units pulled and run thru testing, and > thus, fewer defectives get thru. The top of the line (and also top of the > price line) units may have 1 in 10 tested. Thus, the computer assembler > (like Dell, or Gateway, or Compaq, or eMachines) pays more for the greater > assurance that the units will work properly and therefore will not create > angry customers or the expense of warrantee work. If they are willing to > take a greater chance of having to repair the machine down the line, they > can save $ by installing parts from a less-tested batch that costs them > less to buy. > > So a Pentium IV chip running at 2 gig in an eMachines unit is the same chip > as one running in a Dell unit, but its likely that the eMachines chip came > from a batch that was not quality tested or minimally tested, the Dell chip > was more likely to have tested. Put another way, the eMachines unit may > work fine for years, or it may fail within hours (ANY unit can do that, of > course). But the likelihood of failure is greater with the cheaper unit. > You trade the cheaper price for less certainty of quality. > > That being said, the computer industry works on razor thin profit > margins. To say competitive, ANY way of cutting cost must be looked at, > and that means that formerly quality obsessed companies like Dell may be > tempted to use a mid-level priced chip, knowing that they (and the > customer) will be taking a greater chance of warrantee work/failure down > the road. One way to assess this is to look at the computer magazines that > rate computers (PC World is one)...check the section on user satisfaction > or frequency of repairs. Note that companies like Dell and Gateway that > used to be towards the top with fewest repairs are declining. Also, look > at the warrantee repair period. Does one company offer a longer > warrantee? If so, its likely they have greater confidence in their product > because of the level of quality parts that went into it. > > Hope this helps! > > > At 09:47 AM 8/6/2004 -0400, you wrote: > >I'm looking to purchase a new computer this weekend, and I'm noticing > >eMachine brand computers in a lot of the ads. I checked out the web > >site and eMachines is a company owned now by Gateway. What I would > >like to know is if any of you have an eMachine brand computer and what > >you like or don't like about it. > > Mark Williams > Consulting Librarian > Professional Services for Conferences, Districts, Workshops > markwilliams@makaw.net > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > "The closest thing you will find to an orderly universe is a good library" -------------------------------------------------------------------- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------