Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Netters, In response to Betty Winslow's query about barcode placement (inside or outside), I have an additional comment to add to my previous post of March 31, 2005 (see: Subject: Re: [LM_NET] missing barcodes & placement -Suggestion): Today a second grader came to my counter to check out. As she did, another student came up and flipped open a large picture book (in order to find the barcode). The sharp corner of the picture book missed her eye by less than an inch. This has happened on more than one occasion. It is another reason I have worked diligently to REMOVE barcodes (placed by my predecessors) on the inside page or cover, and transfer them to the top back cover so books will NOT have to be opened for checkout/return. Thankfully we have had no injuries so far. Perhaps others have not had this potentially dangerous problem arise, but at our school, we have the kids locate their barcodes to speed up the process. Not only is opening a book to find the barcode time-consuming, but it is awkward to hold open, and then lift a book to the scanner when it is open, especially when you have another one stacked under it. (Our scanner is on a holder, we don't trigger it). While it would be highly unlikely for this sort of accident to happen at a middle school or high school, here at an elementary site it has the potential of happening frequently, with students flipping open large picture books, especially at a counter that is the height ours is. Perhaps you have the "luxury" (may I call it that?) of having a clerk who can flip open and close each book at the circ desk while you continue assisting students or other tasks, but many of us (especially at elementary sites) are on our own. We MUST to find efficient ways of doing our most frequent tasks, or we would easily be overwhelmed by the number of high frequency, repetitive tasks like circulation. Having barcodes on the back enables my 4th - 6th graders to scan in and out their own books. It enables me to "stagger and stack" and very efficiently scan a group of 4 or 5 books for fast check in or out. Occasionally teachers send quantities of books in without students who can stay to assist me. By stack and stagger (staggering the barcodes) I can get through encyclopedia sets or state books in just moments instead of minutes, and minimize repetitive wrist damage. Having them on the outside speeds up inventory exponentially. Perhaps others can justify placing barcodes inside, I can't. Others may say they are concerned about barcodes on the outside being damaged, and they may be right about this at their site. I can tell you that I have seen more barcodes (left uncovered) on the INSIDE of books damaged than barcodes on the outside damaged. I would encourage Betty and others to strongly consider the long-term benefits of outside placement versus "saving the cost of a barcode cover" - it's ten cents very well invested, in my experience. Joanne Ladewig, Library Media Technician (a.k.a. "Library Lady") Lawrence Elementary School, GGUSD Garden Grove, CA USA shatz@verizon.net ---Comments are my own and may not reflect the views of GGUSD. -------------------------------------------------------------------- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------