Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
The December Issue of No Child Left Volume III, Number 12, December, 2005 This month's issue offers a long article exploring the simple-minded notions embedded in NCLB/Helter/Skelter. A brief excerpt follows, but the full article is available at http://nochildleft.com Weighing the Pig: NCLB as Simple-Minded Con By Jamie McKenzie There is an old saying that you can't fatten a pig by weighing it. NCLB proponents have been busily weighing the pig in the name of school reform, promising that unproven change strategies such as annual testing will lead to improved student learning. Recent NAEP results show this reform package is a con. While the weighing has been going on frantically for some three years now, the pig is no fatter. Reading and math scores are basically stagnant. In addition, many of the states have employed easy tests that make their students look good until measured by the NAEP. Note the November 26, 2005 article by Sam Dillon in the New York Times, "Students Ace State Tests, but Earn D's From U.S." (Registration required.) Would you like to buy the Brooklyn Bridge? How about some Snake Oil? Given the absurdity of the basic strategies underlying NCLB/Helter-Skelter, it is hard to understand how both parties in Congress voted for it in the first place. It is even harder to understand continued support as NCLB damage accumulates and a generation of children suffers a factory-style education that limits them severely, turning childhood for many into a tale from Dickens. Many children are being nickel and dimed educationally. ("Nickel and Dimed" is Barbara Ehrenreich's book about minimum wage life in America.) We now know that the so-called "Texas Miracle" that served as a model for the NCLB strategies was a fraud. The improved test scores were often engineered through a series of tactics that ranged from dishonest to unsound "teaching to the test." Texas students could not replicate success on a national test. Note "The Testing Gap" in the January 2005 issue of No Child Left. The chart at the left shows the gap between claims of student proficiency on state tests and the actual proficiency levels as measured by NAEP, the National Assessment of Educational Progress. ----- What is the price of this bridge? When someone offers us a bridge or a vial of snake oil, we should ask more than the price. Unfortunately, Congress has asked few of the questions it should have asked. Too much of the questioning has centered on whether funding is adequate. Not enough attention was devoted to basic premises. Educators need to help Congress understand that NCLB cannot work even if fully funded. Unfortunately, the NCLB experiment has been imposed on schools and the states without much consultation of educators. We are witnessing what happens when folks without understanding, expertise or wisdom presume to reform an industry about which they are poorly informed. Even before the Bush administration came to Washington, both political parties toyed with the mistaken notion that "weighing the pig" would force malingering teachers and principals to "fatten the pig." The first President Bush and Bill Clinton were fans of this strategy. There is no evidence that weighing the pig works as a fattening strategy, but this lack of evidence has not deterred Congress and the Education Department from wading in with heavy boots and heavy scales. These are not the scales of justice. They are crude measures in many case forcing schools to narrow their focus and change their tactics in ways that are unhealthy for children. Jennifer Booher-Jennings' article in the November 2005 issue of No Child Left "From Classroom to Emergency Room: Educational Triage in American Schools" shows the kind of damage done to children when schools are forced to focus so directly on test scores. Dictating educational policies like annual testing is fundamentally unconstitutional as the founders clearly expected that the states would make laws governing education of children, not Congress. Educational Porridge is Unhealthy Oliver Twist suffered through meals that were unhealthy and lacking in nutrition. Children in many American schools would recognize the diet. Milk-and-cracker curricula combine with drill-and-kill learning to turn school into a dreary experience. ----- 20 Simple Minded Notions Lurking Behind NCLB 1. "Educating the Whole Child" is an outmoded luxury. 2. Recess is a waste of time. 3. What matters is basic literacy. 4. Segregated schooling does not contribute to school failure. 5. Poor kids don't need art, music and citizenship. 6. If you test just two aspects of learning, the rest will still get lots of attention. 7. Inexpensive standardized tests are rich and accurate indicators of student performance. 8. Inexpensive standardized tests provide data to guide better instruction. 9. Schools will get better results if they imitate McDonald's, Wal-Mart and Burger King. 10. Shame, fear and humiliation are effective motivators for teachers and principals. 11. Corporate style competition is a healthy and effective model for a learning organization. 12. Annual testing turns children into better readers. 13. Children learn best when limited to a narrow range of educational experiences taught in highly standardized ways. 14. Elevated levels of threat and risk create healthy environments for learning and teaching. 15. Skilled veteran teachers will keep teaching even when the work life of teachers has been radically shifted. 16. Talented new teachers will rush to work in schools that are more like factories than institutions of learning. Unleashing the NCLB Dogs 17. Educators don't know what they are doing. Retort 18. Parents and families are not responsible for student performance. Retort 19. Increased poverty and the growth of low wage jobs have nothing to do with student performance. 20. Congress can push down on one aspect of a complex system without responsibility for other aspects of the system like funding Head Start or programs that generate well paying jobs. Each of these is explained at some length at http://nochildleft.com/2005/dec05weighing.html Jamie McKenzie Editor, No Child Left http://nochildleft.com editor@nochildleft.com FNO Press 500 15th Street Bellingham, WA 98225 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------