Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I think it depends on what the intended purpose or goal is. If a child is still learning how to read, then the printed page is necessary, whether alone or along with sound. If the issue is absorbing the story, the content, the issues, then the medium is not necessarily the message. Of course, with young children, or non-readers, those are often blurred. But by high school, one may be more dominant for any given task. Lisa J. Dempster Head (ACL) of Library Resources Riverdale Collegiate Institute Toronto Ontario Canada http://schools.tdsb.on.ca/riverdale/ jpointer03@hotmail.com (temporary and changing email just for listservs) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shonda Brisco" <sbrisco@FWCDS.ORG> To: <LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 8:09 AM Subject: [LM_NET] Audio Books: Not Really Reading? I have recently had some discussions with librarians about audio books---primarily using audible books via an iPod for listening. While the technology issue is one thing that I talk with them about (basically trying to explain it), the issue that strikes me as being rather unbending is the idea that these librarians have stated: "Listening to books on tape / audible version is NOT reading." While I understand the concepts of the difference between the printed page and the audio page, I cannot seem to grasp the idea behind their belief that a student who CAN read but chooses to listen to books instead is NOT reading. As a librarian for the blind for ten years, I helped hundreds of students who would never be able to read print find literary skills through listening to books on tape. When I presented that issue, these librarians dismissed it as being a "handicap issue" rather than an issue of literacy for "normal people." When I asked if ONLY books in print, read with the actual book in hand, were considered to be REAL reading, they all agreed. When I asked if books in print that had been digitalized for electronic reading was REAL reading, they agreed in part only because the information COULD be printed out (which is another issue too). But when I asked if the book that was in print but placed in an audio format could be considered "real reading" ---they said, NO. Their comments where that "real reading" included seeing the words, the punctuation, the way the sentences were formed, and the relationship of the words. My question was whether those elements could also be understood by the auditory learner WITH a book in hand and a tape / audio version? They said, "ditch the tape." I don't know if I am really sensitive to the issues of "reading" in all formats available to students and their learning styles or abilities, or if I am just a little sensitive to the complete disregard of anything that is not in a bound format, but my final statement to these librarians was, "Get ready for it, ladies.....reading formats are changing and we need to prepare our students for EVERY possible medium that may become available to them---or they will become illiterate in the modes of information transmission / reception." What are your ideas? Are audio books considered "real reading" for students who can read or who might be using them in cooperation with the print for better understanding of the text? I've pondered this for about a month and a recent discussion once again brought me back to the same place. Thanks for your insights! ~Shonda Shonda Brisco, MLIS US / Technology Librarian Fort Worth Country Day School Fort Worth, TX "Start by doing what is necessary, then what is possible and suddenly you are doing the impossible." ~St. Francis of Assisi sbrisco@fwcds.org http://www.fwcds.org/campus/libraries/default.asp -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------