Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
We just converted all of our libraries to a Union database. Any ISBN that had something in parenthesis after the number or a subfield that didn't match did NOT merge. If we'd paid for the conversion help, most of these would have been taken care of I'm sure. But all those (pbk) or whatever designations caused problems that somebody has to deal with. Think to the future, is a district union catalog something you should be preparing for now? Yes, 020 tags are repeatable. Jean R. Jean Gustafson Teacher/Librarian Selah Jr. High Selah, WA 98942 jeangustafson@selah.k12.wa.us http://www.selah.k12.wa.us/JHS/Gustafson/Library.cfm -----Original Message----- From: School Library Media & Network Communications [mailto:LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Konda Wightman Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:57 AM To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Subject: HIT: Cataloging question Hi, Two weeks ago I asked the question about where in the MARC record to put the second ISBN number on company-bound books, such as Perma-Bound, Follett, etc. and which of the two ISBN's found on those types of books is the primary one. I received several responses to my query, as well as talking to a library cataloging instructor and checking a couple of the resources we have on cataloging here in the district library. All the respondents said that they put all ISBN's in the 020 tag (which is repeatable in the $a subfield), with most people putting the ISBN they find on the Verso page in the first subfield, with any subsequent ones added after that. Some people put in parentheses that it's a Follett-bound or other binding, some put in "hardcover" if the binding is from an original paperback, or "pbk" if it's a paperback, and some put nothing after the ISBN. The instructor and the resources I consulted said that even putting in the additional ISBN (the one found on the back cover of a specially bound book) is acceptable, but optional, as is the designation of the type of cover or binding. So it looks like you're doing the right thing no matter what you are currently doing, whether it's adding the number or skipping it. Thank you so much for responding to my question. Konnie Konnie Wightman Bismarck Public Schools Hughes Ed. Center/LMO 806 N. Washington St. Bismarck, ND 58501 http://library.educ8.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------