Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
This discussion has had us debating all day so I figured I would post to everyone. Using the argument that this is the way we have always done it does not invalidate the the idea that shelving by genre might better serve our constituency. It does seem that library patrons are not happy with the way we arrange the our books which is why so many of them use Barnes and Noble instead. Children constantly come in asking for books by genre and it is much more difficult to find them when they are shelved by author. In an elementary school using the computer can hamper a child's ability to find books so only connecting the books that way doesn't actually make it easier. How much do we want to emphasize the process over giving children access? In our catalog, if you type in mystery you will find 330 titles. How do we expect a fourth grader to browse the catalog to find a book that looks interesting? It just becomes overwhelming. And while it is easy for us to skim through the catalog this way, the question becomes does it make sense to kids? Does this actually teach children that libraries are just unfriendly places? On the other hand, learning to read and alphabetical order are skills we really try and teach children so keeping books by author supports the curriculum, both ours and the classrooms'. Arranging books by genre might also split an author's body of work into several different areas, however, it would still be easier to track an author than a genre in the catalog. Also, deciding which genre certain books fall into is much less concrete than shelving by author and the next person at your job might not understand why you put Coraline in Fantasy and not Horror. The sheer amount of time and energy it would take to redo a collection is definitely an issue as well. We're not really sure where we stand on this, but it does have us thinking : ) We're now considering polling the students and faculty to see what they think. Thanks so much for such an invigorating topic. Tali Balas Librarian, PreK - 3 Ethical Culture Fieldston School tbalas@ecfs.org 212.712.6293 -----Original Message----- From: School Library Media & Network Communications [mailto:LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU]On Behalf Of Deb Evers Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 12:13 PM To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Subject: GEN, MID/SEC: Reorganizing Fiction by Genre The October, 2005 issue of Library Media Connection included an article written by Middle School LMS Elizabeth P. Dumas. The article, "Give 'Em What They Want: Reorganizing Your Fiction Collection by Genre," outlined steps to "merchandise" the fiction collection by rearranging and shelving fiction in like groups (Mystery, Historical fiction, Romance, Fantasy, etc.) This would make the fiction collection more user-friendly since the kids are used to finding books arranged in this way in bookstores. It would also answersome of those infernal questions like, "Where are all of the funny books?" or "I can't find the fantasy books." I guess my question to you venerable sages is...What do you think about this? I keep thinking about the pros and cons, and mulling it over. I realize that it would require a LOT of work initially, but I can't seem to shake the idea that it would be a good idea. HELP! Talk me out of it! Deb Evers, Library Media Specialist Cushing High School Cushing, OK devers@cushinghs.k12.ok.us A house without books is like a room without windows. No man has a right to bring up children without surrounding them with books.... Children learn to read being in the presence of books. - Horace Mann -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------