Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I specified Julius Caesar because that was the only Shakespeare on the Sophomore Honors curriculum at her school. Any Shakespeare--The Tempest, Macbeth, etc. would have been great. I just wanted her to have an exposure to it more than once. It's a shame that the teacher didn't think the girls were equally worth appealing to. When I taught Senior GT/AP English, we read, among other things: Beowulf, Canterbury Tales, Paradise Lost, Hamlet, and then, Pride and Prejudice or Wuthering Heights. I felt the girls were due something that wasn't so male focused. I had problems with boys who said, "Why are we reading this Chick Lit?" I said, "It's a classic!" Vicki :-) Vicki Nelson Librarian Odessa High School Ector County ISD >>> Debbie Balsam <dbalsam@cox.net> 05/08/06 12:29 PM >>> Dear Vicki, I didn't read Julius Caesar in my Regent English class either and that was in the 1960's. We read 1 a year Macbeth, Hamlet, and I think the Tempest, can't remember the third. So not everyone read the same literature in HS. I remember complaining to my Sophomore English teacher about all the male oriented books and requested a female character for one of our novels. He replied that they needed to keep the male interest and the females enjoyed reading. In HS I didn't care for Shakespeare. To hard to understand. As an adult with our Kennedy Center play subscription, we see a Shakespeare play every year, usually by the Royal Shakespeare Company. Now I enjoy the plays. I bring more maturity and a better sense of history to the experience. Debra Balsam. retired Vienna, Va dbalsam@cox.net On May 8, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Vicki Nelson wrote: > When I graduated with a degree in English, I was much more prepared in > content than in educational techniques because the college I attended > required that you graduate with a degree and then get certified for > teaching. My content classes were very rigorous while the educational > ones were not that helpful. > > I've also noticed that there is less rigor in classes across the > board. As you pointed out, fifteen years ago when I started teaching, > we taught 3 novels a semester. Now, they are not likely to be > required to read more than one. I *think* the standardized testing > has something to do with this. There is so much focus on it that > everything else falls by the wayside. > > I'm still a little annoyed that my daughter, who is 24 wasn't required > to read Julius Caesar in her Honors Sophomore English class. I'll > eventually get over it <g>, but the reason she didn't * the teacher > didn't like teaching Shakespeare and substituted Frankenstein. The > thing is, they don't read Shakespeare as a junior, and if the senior > teacher also doesn't like to teach Shakespeare, they go all the way > through highschool without any exposure. Also, (English teacher > ranting her--Julius Caesar helps them get ready to read and understand > senior Shakespeare plays like Hamlet and King Lear that can be > difficult on the first go around). > > I wanted my students to graduate with a core of knowledge in addition > to knowing how to think critically, study effectively and find > information on their own. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------