Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
For those who are interested ... Laura's post asking whether we are InfoLit teachers, reading teachers or technology teachers highlights a key difference between US teachers and those in other countries, especially in the primary (elementary) area. In Australia, in the primary sector, we are all just teachers - we are expected to be able to teach all the key learning areas which are identified as English (reading, writing, viewing, speaking and listening), Mathematics, Science, Social Studies, Health and Physical Education, The Arts, Languages Other than English and Technology (as in designing and making things). There is no separation of duties into subject area specialisations although schools often employ a specialist in LOTE, Music or PE to cover classes during teacher planning times. In most primary schools, the TL is part of this team covering planning time. Apart from these times (about 2 hours/week), teachers stay with the same group of kids all day every day. Things like ICT are expected to be integrated into the daily program and again, we are expected to be proficient in this tool. As the teacher-librarian, I had to have teaching qualifications and experience first and then my library quals on top of that, and although my focus when I took classes was Information Literacy and Literature, within those I could/would directly and indirectly teach nearly all the KLAs. If the unit had an InfoLit thrust, then I would often teach ICT, amongst other things, as I helped students to locate, select and evaluate Internet sources or help them use a particular piece of software/hardware to put their presentation together. Maths was key as I taught them how to use the Dewey system to locate information. If it had a literature thrust then I explicitly taught reading during the book orientation, its reading and the follow up. Teaching is more than just standing in front of a class doing chalk and talk - every time we pick up a book and read it, we are modelling and teaching students something about the value of reading. No doubt many of you do the same thing and if you really stop to analyse your teaching you will find that you are as much a generalist as a specialist! And, if you look closely at what, how and why you teach you will find that separation into specific subjects only happens on the timetable, not in the real world. I think the key thing to remember is that we teach students not subjects! Barbara PS. FWIW, this year I have devoted three of my columns in Teacher Librarian to how to read aloud effectively - there is more to it than meets the eye - and there are many suggestions there for the LMS and the classroom teacher. Barbara Braxton Teacher Librarian PALMERSTON ACT 2913 AUSTRALIA E. barbara@iimetro.com.au "Together we learn from each other." -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------