Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Hi Jacquie: I believe you are describing an all too-common problem, but to my mind what you are describing is really two different issues. I have this problem as well (students starting with the PowerPoint) and although it has improved, it will take a concerted effort by both the librarian and the teacher who has assigned the project to end this trend. However, please allow me to digress for a moment to get something off my chest. I REALLY HATE the terms “digital native” and “digital immigrant”. (Did anyone gush about how amazing the generation born into the era of automobiles was? I doubt it. They were too busy trying to survive a World War and the challenges that followed) These terms somehow imply that kids are superior to adults in their ability to navigate around technology. They aren’t. The fact that they were born into a world of techno-gadgets obviously gives them a head start in their familiarity with it. But let’s face it: it’s not that kids are extra-brilliant these days, it’s that the technology is so darn easy to use. It’s just a matter of learning sequences of clicks and commands. I think it’s much more impressive that so many adults, who have witnessed these dramatic changes, have so easily adapted to technology. But at any rate, native/immigrant is really not the issue regarding the overuse of the much-too-ubiquitous PowerPoint. The issue is the research process. If we teach and promote the Big 6, for example, the creation of the PowerPoint is Step 5 (synthesis). If we hold students to each of the six steps, then the students first should have: selected a topic & brainstormed the scope of information; brainstormed all possible sources and evaluated those sources for usefulness; located those sources; and completed the note-taking process. Then, and ONLY then, should they start putting together the end product, whether it’s a PowerPoint, paper, poster, or whatever. Copying and pasting information directly from the source onto a PowerPoint slide is not only lazy and completely lacking in any thought, it’s plagiarism. Because they have put no thought into what they are doing, of course they are going to stumble over unfamiliar words (which they haven’t bothered to look up) and of course their presentation is going to be lousy because they really don’t know anything about their topic. As far as images, they gather these not taking into consideration what the maximum impact of matching image to text might have, but simply because it’s fun and easy. It takes no thought whatsoever to do a Google image search. (And here you have fair use issues, because how many students are keeping track of the websites they get their images from?) Furthermore, not only do students know very little about their topic, but often couldn’t tell you anything about the image on their slide. The answer is to hold students to the research model standards and to evaluate them at each step of the process. Evaluate them on the quality of the information they impart and their perceived knowledge of their topic, not the bells and whistles that they can so easily add to a Powerpoint presentation. Dorothy Scanlan Librarian St. Paul's School dscanlan@stpaulsschool.org --------------------------------- You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------