Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I just would like to see what it looks like in the catalog itself. If I want a book on bears would it say Animals/Mammals/Bears where the call number used to be? Would the subjects then be followed by author letters? How do you then find the section you need in the library? Obviously in smaller libraries and small bookstores it would be easy to find if the signage is very clear. Larger libraries maybe not so much... In a numbering system, the numbers are obviously sequential - so once you find the beginning it is a logical step to go to the next number range. Maybe what we need for Dewey to be more user-friendly is to mark the sections more clearly to help browsers. I am looking at the end caps of my shelving right now and wondering how I could create better signs for folks to find what they are looking for. The subject headings they are using....I wonder where I could locate a list. Perhaps I could combnie them with the dewey categories to create better signs.... I'm always looking to make it easier for our kids to find books. This year I merged my reference and non-fiction and just love it. Dropping dewey though. I don't see the advantage when better signs could do the trick. I'd be willing to bet that the public doesn't realize there is a system to the way bookstores organize. I'll bet they assume the book store managers choose the subject headings. They just wander around till they find something. Probably most book store users are there mostly to browse. Using better more enticing signs might encourage our students to do more browsing. I find that many if not most of our students find books that way anyway. Keeping the dewey numbers might make it easier for the person who uses the catalog to find specific books. Other thought - using/teaching dewey also means that (theoretically) student learn how to navigate around any library. However - obviously not all libraries use the same system - so that is not entirely true. Interesting to think about. Bottom line.... It's just too big a change for me to be interested in for quite some time, and I think making the signage more user-friendly would accomplish the same thing. Jacquie "You see, I don't believe that libraries should be drab places where people sit in silence, and that's been the main reason for our policy of employing wild animals as librarians...." (Monty Python) "The Librarian, whose job is to heal ignorance, to keep life safe for poetry and to put knowledge smack dab in the middle of the American way." ~ The Philadelphia Inquirer, 9-20-03 “Education is not about filling a pail, it’s about lighting a fire." ~ William Butler Yeats ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jacquie Henry, MLS Ruben A. Cirillo High School (GHS) Gananda Central School District 3195 Wiedrick Road P.O. Box 609 Macedon, NY 14502 315-986-3521 x 3144 jhenry@gananda.org Library Page: http://www.gananda.org/webpages/hslibrary/ Blog - Library Links For Teachers: http://rachslibrary.edublogs.org/ Blog - Wanderings http://wanderings.edublogs.org/ >>> On 6/8/2009 at 9:36 AM, in message <763cd2be0906080636s307b4f22k11b35cc0671c71a3@mail.gmail.com>, Kris Fallon <librarychickie@GMAIL.COM> wrote: I have heard of this before and I do believe it has caused some stir on LMNET. Honestly, I don't see how it could be any more complicated than Dewey. I imagine that once you come to a point of specificity ( where that point is can vary with Dewey as well; do you stop at animals 590, mammals 599, large mammals 599.7, , bears 599.74, polar...etc) a book would be shelved by author as I've seen in bookstores. I remember being told by a professor in library school that catalogers were very particular about their craft and I could imagine that many may not agree with me. But, I think Dewey was a very important system prior to the digital/keyword catalogs...now I'm not so sure the number aspect of it is. I know I feel a bit lost in a book store with their system but is that because it is an inferior one or is it because I'm not used it? Are the word based systems change for change's sake? Or, are they a better way of doing things in today's world and I need to try an adjust? I am contemplating a word based system for our new school library...any other school librarians considering it? -- Kristina Fallon, LMS Robert Morris School, k-8 So Bound Brook, NJ librarychickie@gmail.com "Only the educated are free." - Epictus, (Greek-born, Roman slave and philosopher- 55 AD - 135 AD) On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Jacqueline Henry <JHenry@gananda.org> wrote: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, you send a message to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * LM_NET Help & Information: http://lmnet.wordpress.com/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/join.html * LM_NET Supporters: http://lmnet.wordpress.com/category/links/el-announce/ --------------------------------------------------------------------