Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Dear Lindy I just sent you a message offlist and it was immediately returned to me with this message ... " Your message was not delivered because the destination computer refused to accept it (the error message is reproduced below). This type of error is usually due to a mis-configured account or mail delivery system on the destination computer". Please read the message below which might explain why you appear to have not included every message in your hit. Barbara Barbara Braxton Teacher Librarian COOMA NSW 2630 AUSTRALIA E. barbara.288@bigpond.com Together we learn from each other -----Original Message----- From: Barbara Braxton [mailto:barbara.288@bigpond.com] Sent: Thursday, 7 January 2010 6:59 AM To: 'Lindy Pals' Subject: RE: [LM_NET] MIDDLE: Mature Collection Hi Lindy I was just checking my deleted items folder for something else and I noticed that there were a number of emails to the list asking you to contact them because their emails to you had bounced. Even if you contacted those people, maybe others haven't even realised their email bounced. Perhaps that might explain why you may have missed some and people thought you had edited your responses. I appreciated your hit because the responses reflected what I did in my library way-back-when when I had a Senior Fiction collection separate from the rest and labelled as such so I could cater for those students who were ready to start on YA stuff. We were a K-6 school. To read that this would breach the law in your country and there is a precedent set just totally astonished me because I think it shows the teacher librarian implementing the duty of care we are all entrusted with as educators. My experience was similar to the one of the person who said that complaints went down (we only ever had a couple because I had this section from the very start) and senior reading increased. At the beginning of each year I wrote to the parents of the Yr 5/6 students explaining the purpose of the section and that it might be possible that their child would choose something that they were not yet ready for and, if so, just to return it. Being pro-active was smart and I can only remember one issue which fizzled almost immediately. In fact, it was the teachers who needed to be told just because a Yr 3 student was an independent reader did not mean they were ready for the themes of this section. Good luck with your discussions and decisions. Barbara Barbara Braxton Teacher Librarian COOMA NSW 2630 AUSTRALIA E. barbara.288@bigpond.com Together we learn from each other -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, you send a message to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * LM_NET Help & Information: http://lmnet.wordpress.com/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/join.html * LM_NET Supporters: http://lmnet.wordpress.com/category/links/el-announce/ --------------------------------------------------------------------