Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Group, I hope my other two messages about went through. After I forwarded them, I received several "bounced" messages, and I wasn't sure where they were coming from. The gist of the other two were that Dr. Fetler was interested in challenges to _The Giver_ and the Rutherford Institute which was involved. I have permission from Dr. Miller to post his message. I thought you might find it interesting. Betty ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 1994 12:03:51 -0400 From Ed Miller <MILLERED@HUGSE1.HARVARD.EDU> To Multiple recipients of list K12ADMIN <K12ADMIN@suvm.acs.syr.EDU> Subject: Re: Rutherford Institute To Mark Fetler: The Rutherford Institute appears to be a "public interest" law firm, funded by private donations, which uses litigation to defend "Christian rights"-- particularly the "right" to religious speech in public schools. I have no direct experience with them, but have found the following references in recent publications: W. John Moore. "The Lord's Litigators." _National Journal_, vol. 26, no. 27 (July 2, 1994), p. 1560. Sara Diamond. "The Religious Right Goes to Court." _The Humanist_, vol. 54, no. 3 (May-June 1994), p. 35. Tim Stafford. "Move Over, ACLU." _Christianity Today_, vol. 37, no. 12 (Oct. 25, 1993), p. 20. I'd love to hear more about the outcome of your own case. Ed Miller, Harvard Education Letter millered@hugse1.harvard.edu