Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
No Gail, I don't think you should shut up; your comments prompted me to reply to the whole list, something I rarely do. I often lurk quietly, as I read mail late at night, and always risk sounding foolish (I think). In any event, I run a School library media center where the policy is one book at a time for first graders, 2 books at a time for grades 2-5. If the kids have left their books home, I ask if they know where the missing books are. If the child knows, and tells me the books will be back the next day, I _always_ say: "I trust you! Sign out more books today; bring the old ones back tomorrow." The old books get returned the next day *most* of the time. As I have an automated system, I can see who has how many books out during circulation. That's when I catch up with the devious, or crazed, or forgetful ones who may have 5 or 6 books out. That's when their privledges get temporarily suspended, notices get printed, etc. My answer to "How many books can I sign out?" is "How many do you need?" We can usually reach a quick compromise at that point. Before I started using an automated system, my policies were more rigid. I'm more relaxed about it now, having lots more fun (can never have too much!), and overdues aren't a big problem for me. Thanks group, for reading all this! Beth Bugnaski Library Media Specialist Seven Oaks Elem. Baltimore County, Maryland bugnaski@umd5.umd.edu On Sat, 19 Nov 1994, Gail K. Dickinson wrote: > I know, I am a supervisor and should therefore just shut up, but I > really can't help it. > > Out of 6 elementary schools, (approx. 500 kids each), I have convinced > one, maybe two librarians to remove all limits from reading. My > rationale on this is that from reading THE POWER OF READING, I know that > in order to give kids a chance, they must read. I also want to point > out how increased access through technology, and increasing staffing to > 1 certified SLMS per school, has increased reading. One elementary > school in particular circulates wildly (the librarian is on this list, > and probably cringing right now). Kids are walking out with 6, 7, 9 > books. What's the overdue rate? It's high, but not inordinately so. > We must remove all barriers to reading. We can't on the one hand tell > kids to read intensively, and on the other hand limit the numbers of > books they check out. > > My argument to librarians I supervise, and the closest I have ever come > to a direct order is, "Find a way to answer the question, 'How many > books can I check out?', without using a number". > > > *************************** > Gail Dickinson > Union-Endicott Central School District > Endicott, NY 13760 > > "a wild patience has taken me this far" >