Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
In response to Carol Simpson's concerns about CEMARC, there are several important elements about the CEMARC format: e.g., 520, reviews (and I see teachers submitting their comments about the use of learning materials,for inclusion in the notes field); 521, grade, interest and motivation level (audience) of the material, as well as special audience characteristics (hearing impaired, gifted,etc.); and curriculum objectives. Most of these elements will NOT need to be changed once entered, although they might be added to (additionally enhanced). While it is true that curriculum objectives at a state level may change, so do traditional subject headings. The catalog, card as well as electronic, needs regular maintenance and updating. In the electronic age, it is also possible that curriculum objectives might be globally changed. Further, the curriculum objectives may be national, state and/or local...the field is repeatable and there is opportunity for vendors to enter elements as well as members of state database systems (like Texas), and also for local school districts, e.g.,Plano, TX, develops units with overarching interdisciplinary themes and these can be linked to specific materials. I see CEMARC as the era beyond standards...school library databases have worked to adhere to mainstream standards and are ready for the enhancement stage to truly link library resources to learning units, interests and environments (and these go beyond schools to homes, museums, etc.) There ARE challenges and one of them is to develop national curriculum terms for different subject areas. I am doing research in this field and am interested in hearing from anyone who has suggestions. I also attended the CEMARC Institute in OH last weekend. Roger Miniere of the NWOET Foundation has been a pioneer in developing a statewide database of CEMARC records that adhere to minimum standards as well as providing particular curriculum enhancements. He will be putting this out on the Internet soon, with input from Institute participants and others. You will be able to view these records and learn more about developing curriculum enhancements. I expect that workshops will also be given around the country...I know that several of us are planning some here in Texas. Catherine Murphy Assistant Professor School of Library & Info. Sciences University of North Texas murphy@lis.unt.edu