Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I want your opinion on this situation. I am very distressed because I have spent four years developing a Middle School Library which I now feel on the brink of perfecting, BUT, as I see it, I am suddenly being asked to add non-library services to my facility from administration and mucking up what was to have been a great program. Here's the scene: I was vocal as an advocate for automation. Following a hard drive failure on an old apple II circ system I appealed that the time was right for automation and administration listened and, about nine months later, I have a fully automated circ/cat program(winnebago) running on a Novell network with six workstations (I would like to call them "searchstations") on the floor for students.* As soon as the hardware was in and I had things up and running to a satisfactory degree, the technology coordinator walks in and tells me that she is going to have other software programs installed for teachers to use on these stations-- programs for drill and instruction, record keeping, etc. Now-- we have a computer lab. It's a Mac Lab with about 15 macs and 15 apple IIs. Yet I was being asked to put this stuff on the library catalog platform which was now home to the catalog, a periodical index/database, and a database of career information, all of which are read only resources consistent with the library mileau. I was steamed. The arguments I heard were predicatable: "but don't you WANT to attract teachers into the library?" "Perhaps my idea of what a library is is BROADER than yours..)" Boy, those arguments insult me. BROADER to me means BLURRIER in this case and the former argument is just rhetoric: I could give away money to attract teachers too. Here's the case: I had a great little LAN going (for about a week) with just the right amount of solid library resources on it. Some students were confused as to the nature of the resources, but they were quickly catching on. Now I feel its about to be wrecked. *Am I overreacting? *Am I being used as a surrogate "computer lab supervisor" rather than a librarian. *Are such non-library services and ADDITION TO or a DILUTION FROM my mission? Do YOU have similar stories about librarians whose catalogs, once automated, became computer "labs" with all sorts of stuff put on to them? Is this O.K. in your opinion? Let me know what YOU think. *by the way, never did I explicitly or tacitly agree to administer a computer lab. -- ----JEFFREY G. HASTINGS -- E-MAIL: JHASTING@edcen.ehhs.cmich.edu -------- or 73164.423@compuserve.com -Hell is other people.- FAX: (517) 545-1407