Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
TO THOSE WHO SAY THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND CYBERPORN LOOKING UP LEGITIMATE THINGS, I SAY THIS... Try looking up "breast cancer" and see what you come up with. You might be shocked. --------------------------------------- Edward Kachinske kachinsk@odysseus.gonzaga.pvt.k12.dc.us --------------------------------------- On Sun, 11 Feb 1996, Union-Endicott Central School District wrote: > Students will, can, and do search many words that are not > curriculum-related, just to see if they are "in there". If we confess, > many of us have done the same thing. Just to see how easy it is, type > in "sex" as a search word in any Internet search mode, and see what you > come up with, It's pretty unbelievable. > > Censorship is not the answer. Education is. A strong AUP, a realistic > and thorough information skills program taught by the information expert > in the school (the librarian ), and consequences for actions that are not > consistent with the AUP is the best answer. > > Government interfering with freedom of access to information is the worst > possible scenario. > > Gail Dickinson > > On Sun, 11 Feb 1996, Carol Simpson wrote: > > > On 10 Feb 1996, Tom Whipple wrote: > > > > > to be so familiar with. I've been using the internet for seven years and = > > > no one has made be view or read anything that I did not go looking for. = > > > > I will second that. I have NEVER come across anything inappropriate > > (even in the days of less-than-optimum indexing) while doing an > > appropriate search. Sure, it's quite easy to find porn if you look up > > words like the f-word, or even close variants of appropriate words such > > as "doggy" (as in doggy-style). Chances of a student searching on those > > terms in a curriculum-related search are slim. For those who expect that > > students will search on "dog" and find "doggy-style", look for a search > > engine that ranks results based on how close the results conform to the > > original query. Thus, "dog" is at the top of the list with a result of > > 100, and "doggy" is way down a long list with a rating of 30 or so. > > There is the problem of searching words such as "sexual" as in sexually > > transmitted diseases and locating information on sexual positions). No > > internet advice on that one! However, information about sexual > > positions isn't considered "indecent" and certainly not pornographic > > when presented in an informational manner. > > >