Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
And, finally, part 4.......again thank you all! ****************************************************************************** As far as fairy tales, legends, tall tales, etc. I explain to all my students in Gr. 1-5 that these are very special stories, many very old with no known author, etc. and many originated in other countries. Through these stories we learn about the culture/heritage of these people and are cataloged in the 300's Social Science. Many don't catch on at first but with reminders they do. As far as the 800's--I just say they're a special type of writing/literature. Not very profound but I hope this helps. ****************************************************************************** I tell my students that fairy tales are so old that now one knows who made them upand that they now have decome apart of the culture and that is why they are in the Social Science are. In the olden days all fictions was a part of literature until it became too crownd and it was taken out. All that was left was the poetry and plays. I also don't allow my students to use fairy tales as a definition of fiction, it helps reduce the confusion. ****************************************************************************** My explanation about fairy tales, folk tales, and such is that they are part of the oral tradition of a people. When they began to be developed hundreds of years ago, they played an important part in the history and culture of a people. We keep them in the 398's now, so they can all be found in one spot place in the library, which allows for easier access, rather than having them scattered all through the fiction. Fiction books all have a place in the 800's - depending on the author's country of origin (American, British, French, etc.) But just imagine how cumbersome it would be to find fiction books if they were all assigned Dewey numbers and shelved in the 800's! It makes much better sense to pull them out as we all do, and just file them as "fiction." ****************************************************************************** Try explaining that originally all fiction books were classed in Dewey, but because of the bulk of the fiction most stories/novels were "Pulled-out" of Dewey & given a separate section. I believe that we really shouldn't refer to Dewey classes as non-fiction -- we should distinguish between the two types as fiction and Dewey Decimal. ****************************************************************************** I've recently shelved all the reference apart from general encyclopedias in the main classified sequence. So often before students forgot to look in the reference for subject specific books. Now they are all together, and while there is sometimes disappointment that they are not allowed to take all the books out, at least they've found them. I also try to avoid talking about 'non-fiction' as it seems really odd to define something in terms of what it is not. So I talk about 'information' books. Now I must get to grips with the fact that defining 'fiction' as books from the imagination ignores the fact that I put the poetry with the 'information' books! ****************************************************************************** One of the things I did was to change my definition of nonfiction. I looked the word nonfiction up in the dictionary and chose to use information or facts as simple definitions for lower elem. The problem I have always faced was that teachers chose to use the word "true" with nonfiction. And that does make it difficult to teach students about nonfiction. Good luck. ****************************************************************************** I explain the 398.2s in this way: The 300s cover culture, government, and people in some way. The folktales and fairy tales that are marked 398.2 are so marked because they are part of our cultural history. They've been around since before written history in some form or another so they have become part of our shared knowledge. Since these stories were passed from parent to child for so many generations, we can't really point to one author as having written it (even though we can point to people like Andersen and the Grimms as people who wrote them down and published them in print form for the first time). ****************************************************************************** Good point. As I have been teaching the Dewey system the last couple of years the same thought occurred to me. What I decided to tell my students ( 4th grade)this year is that when Mr. Dewey devised his classification system he created one in which all books could reside. Thus fiction could be placed in the lit section but most libraries have chosen not to do so. That led to a discussion of what other section in the Dewey numbers a person might expect to find "fiction." I have tried to quite using the term "non-fiction" and use the term "Dewey" or "number" section. In rereading your post I guess that I would teach fiction and non-fiction completely separately from the fiction and the Dewey number books. If this helps I know that the faiary and folk tales are in the 300's becuase they are considered paut of the culture of a society. ****************************************************************************** If you haven't heard this already, let me tell you that I was taught that Fairy Tales and the like are in the non-fiction section because they reflect a way of life from other cultures. They taught lessons and were used to instill good behavior in children. That is what I tell my students. As for poetry, I've never questioned that one, so let us know. ****************************************************************************** I just tell them that non-fiction is exactly that--not fiction books! Fiction books are located in a separate section and are either many chapters or just one long piece of fiction. Everything else goes into the "not" fiction section of the library. ****************************************************************************** There was a discussion a while ago about the 398.2 issue. I think the consensus was that they were folktales, part of our society, rather than pure fiction. As far as poetry and literature are concerned, technically "fiction" is a made-up category and all works should be classified in the 800s. ***************************************************************************** In your discussion of the 800's .... Cyndi's response to you was exactly what I was taught back in the 60's in cataloging class. That all fiction books are supposed to have numbers but because of the large size of the collection some have received other designations for ease of use. Just like biographies which could be cataloged into the subject areas instead of being in a BIO section. I, too, tell my classes that all the books could have numbers but ..... ****************************************************************************** Actually, I think I read the explanation in an LM_Net post, or some Dewey Internet articel. The fact is, Dewey had planned for everything to have a classification, including fiction and that is why poetry, fables, short stories, literature have dewey numbers. When discussing fiction with all my classes I tell them that fiction would be found in the 800 class if it hadn;t been decided to separate it because it was such a huge class of material. ****************************************************************************** Tracey Donaldson, LMS Tioga Hills Elementary Apalachin, NY bookluv@aol.com =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 3) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=