Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I think most people have replied. Many people have or are planning to cancel certain periodicals. Several people suggested possible replacements. Thanks for all the responses. Nevertheless, I did come across a title for girls that did seem age appropriate and a good magazine---it's call Blue Jean and is written by teenage girls. The librarians at the local girls schools give it a good recommendation. Interestedly, the periodicals collections in those girls school do not include Glamour, Self, Seventeen, Sassy, etc. I found a new "girls'" magazine for teens. It's called Jump. I have surveyed 3 issues--articles on self-esteem, planning for the future, fashion, self-acceptance, friendship, a bit on media personalities, self-help column, etc. All the usual pieces. What I did NOT see was anything overtly sexual--no articles on sex, no suggestions about how to do "it". I've seen girls reading it, so it must be ok. BTW, I dumped Glamour and Mademoiselle 3 years ago because of content. Seventeen is pushing it now, too. We changed to Vogue (almost all fashion and make-up and very little commentary), Allure, and Teen People for the same reason. I also dropped Rolling Stone, hating to, but I felt there were things I couldn't defend to a parent that had nothing to do with school. I think the topic you raise is an important one and one that many of us put a lot of thought into. Perhaps getting input from the group will be of real use to us. I too, am in the midst of ordering periodicals for next year. I have decided to drop Mademoiselle because of the content of the articles and the ads. It obviously is not a magazine for the high schooler, at least the students at my school. The problem is that I find myself having to drop more and more magazines as they become more and more explicit in both content and advertisement. Maybe I am getting old. Maybe I am finally becoming a conservative. No to both of those possibilities. I am open to suggestions for magazines that should be on the shelves for students that hit on topics and issues of importance to them. Like the original poster, I am given a lot of freedom to choose, but without having a real chance to see the magazines, I have to rely on the input of those who have seen the magazines. What better group to appeal to than the members of LM_NET? Let's share magazine titles that we find are popular with students and ones that stay within the bounds of appropriateness for high schoolers. Thanks for bringing this issue up on the list serv; I am not sure I would have but now that it is there, perhaps there is enough interest to keep it going for awhile. That said I would like to comment on the selection of magazines available to our students. Many popular magazines, especially the ones for young women, have changed the content of the articles. The hair, clothes, makeup, exercise and career articles are the same but the advice and health articles have become more sensational in an effort to gain new readership. Subjects that were once discussed only in the likes of Cosmopolitan are now turning up in every magazine that appeals to women under 60. The supermarket checkout magazines are a prime example. Just look at some of the covers. I would suggest that when we are looking for new magazines to add to our collection we take a trip to the local Barnes & Nobles magazine section or even ask for a sample copy. This may be time consuming but it will give us a better idea of the content than a list from the jobber. What we could also do is to send a letter or e-mail to the magazine letting them know of our displeasure. Canceling a magazine doesn't say as much as a strongly worded letter. The magazine publishers are all looking for wider readership. Maybe if we tell that they have gone too far and we are not going to use their magazine in our high schools and middle schools they will realize that they are losing large numbers of readers in one location. Maybe they will reconsider their content. Well maybe not but who knows. Will you please post a hit? I am getting to reorder also and am deciding about some of the same magazines you mentioned. I am dropping GQ for sure and we dropped Rolling Stone and Redbook last year. Glamour is on my list of questionables for next year. Vicki, you're going to get a firestorm of opinion on this one! I have decided that I am not going to be a panderer for these magazines. I get Seventeen (though with occasional doubts) Rolling Stone (ditto) Teen, and Teen People. I would like to get the kids version of Sports Illustrated sometime but not this year. That's it for those kind of magazines. I dropped Glamour after I found anillustrated article on sex toys in it. Vicki, another magazine we've decided not to renew is Mademoi- selle, which seems to have more and more sexually-oriented arti- cles (eg., what a man's looking for in sex, multiple orgasms, etc.). The girls seem to gravitate towards Seventeen, Teen, and YM, anyway. I hope this helps you out some. We have had trouble with content in Mademoiselle and Glamour. Every cover shouts about sex etc. We have cancelled our subscriptions. I dropped Glamour for those very reasons, and no one is complaining. It's just not geared towards a young teen audience. I'm even a little skeptical of Seventeen sometimes! But I subscribe to it, and Teen which is perhaps more popular. This is certainly a big dilemma at the HS level. :/ I tend to subscribe for two reasons, like everyone else -- research and leisure reading. With research being more electronic (online fulltext), I'm reducing the number of research periodicals in hard copy and going to more leisure reading. I agree that it would be impossible to defend these to the admin or school board. You have to pick your battles, I've decided. I'd rather have a challenge over a book I know I could justify than a magazine that is marginal. Also take a look at GQ, if you get it. Most of my girls seem to be okay with having only Teen, YM, and Seventeen here. If they read the others, it's at home.... I think you make a great point. We like Sassy magazine as a replacement for Glamour, and the other one for all HS kids is The Next Step Magazine. they have a website at http://www.neststepmagazine.com I'm sure they'd send you a sample issue. Its very good, and they won't print the type of articles you described. I plan on dropping Glamour next year for the very reason that you cited. I am replacing it with In Style, which is a cross between Vogue and People. Last year I added Teen People. So far it seems to be "clean" and the kids really like it. Please post a hit. We will replace Glamour with Jump for the reasons you mentioned in your email. I am considered a liberal where censorship is concerned. I ask myself as you did, "Do I want to defend this to parents/administrators/board members." If the answer is no, I don't order it. Vicki Sherouse, Librarian Sentinel High School Missoula, Montana sherouse@marsweb.com =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 3) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv For LM_NET Help & Archives see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=