Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Dear Colleagues, So many messages here begin "I am always amazed at the power of LM-NET...." Now it=B9s my turn. Several days ago, there was a brief thread about confidentiality and student borrowing which led to a much more detailed, private exchange between me and Kathy, another regular here on LM'. I invite you to read the fascinating exchange we have had in the last several days. Even if you choose not to read all of this post, please DO NOT SKIP the final paragraphs. These exchanges are neither repeated in their entirety nor in chronological order, but in an order that I hope will make sense to you. (Kathy, I hope you approve of my editing choices!) Kathy=B9s final message to me is the =46IRST paragraph here: Kathy wrote: K: Chris, Would you please consider posting a message to LM_NET to explain the change in your thinking about this issue? I only ask because the first message was posted to the entire list and there might have been some librarians who thought it sounded like a good idea. I had said (here) that I sometimes discuss with students their reading selections prior to allowing them to borrow certain books. I used _Cider House Rules_ as my example, and described how I might caution a young borrower about some of the volatile issues and language he or she might encounter. But I then went further, explaining how I might, with the student=B9s cooperation (or at least with their knowledge) call the parent to let them know the book was on the way home and to make sure that the parent had no objection to my lending it. It was at this point that Kathy responded to me privately: K: As I read the some of the comments in this thread I became concerned about the lack of confidentiality for the students when the librarian questioned the students about the books they had chosen to check out and the threat to call the student's parents if the the librarian felt the book wasn't suitable for the student in question. K: In states where there are confidentiality laws, librarians should abide by those laws.=A0 Calling the parents about books there children want to check out is a breech in confidentiality that the student should have and has a legal right to expect. K: There are many reasons for confidentiality laws.=A0 Students are sometimes dealing with family problems or are interested in controversial topics which they do not want their parents to know about. K: It is very important that we respect the rights of our student patrons and part of these rights include the right to confidentiality. Many public libraries do not even disclose the titles of overdue books to parents. School libraries should follow their example. My response to her: C: You raise some very interesting issues, and I appreciate your mentioning them to me.=A0 I like to think of myself as a librarian who honor= s student privacy, so your comments brought me up short. C: I HOPE I never come across as threatening.... My remark about calling parents is not designed to trap students, but to let them in on my thinking and genuinely enlist their help in determining a book's suitability. C: I've had students check out books about incest and family violence and would NEVER attempt to involve parents.=A0 I've been crucial in helping some students identify problems and seek help. C: I believe that parents do, however, have a stake in what their children are reading.=A0 And is this not how we protect ourselves from Challenges? But throughout this exchange, I was also in touch with a colleague in my sch= ool: C: Kathy, I shared our latest exchange with a colleague -- she is a friend, the school's representative to the courts, and is up on all things legal. C: To make a long story short, she agrees much more with your position than with mine. I don't mind telling you how surprised I was! Now I have this uneasy sensation that I've been doing it all wrong for years -- not at all a comfortable feeling! C: She says that if I acquire books according to my selection policy, then each book should stand on its own merit and not need "defense" each time somebody wants to check it out.=A0 Student confidentiality is more important than almost any other consideration. C: We went through the obvious example of a child wanting books about incest and family violence, but she thinks that that confidential approach needs to be extended to all borrowing, including fiction. LM-NET colleagues, please hear two things: =46irst, a big, public thank you to Kathy for engaging in this dialog. I have a much clearer picture of the confidentiality issue, and feel I can act within the constraints it imposes without sacrificing my ability to recommend books to my student patrons. Given what my "law friend" has said, it actually feels rather freeing. So, please reconsider my advice about conferring with parents before lending materials. Second, a big, public thank you to you, LM-NET members and organizers. Where else can eleven thousand colleagues discuss matters of such importance in such a supportive and professional way? Peter, surely this is the sort of meaningful exchange you had in mind when you brought us all together. God bless you all, and have a wonderful, restful weekend. Chris Finer, LMG Library Media Program Newfound Regional High School Bristol, NH 03222 cfiner@newfound.k12.nh.us There's no use going to school unless your final destination is the library. --after Ray Bradbury =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST), send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=