Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
At 12:35 PM 2/1/02, Elizabeth Bentley wrote: >When should students have the freedom to choose for themselves? Do >they have to wait until they are no longer financially dependent on >their parents, or does the moment come at some earlier point? If so >when? Along those same lines, at what point do you hold the child responsible? I'm thinking here about a situation where a child checks out an expensive book and severely damages or loses it. Do you ask the parents to pay, or the child? I suspect that most of us would expect the parents to cover the loss. Why, then, should we not accept their ideas about what is or is not acceptable for their children to read? I'm not talking about what is purchased for the library, only about what a particular child checks out. Rights and responsibilities go together. If the parent is responsible for the child's loss, then the parent also has the right to say what the child may or may not check out. If we're going to say that we will permit children to check out materials against the known wishes of the parents, then the children must also be accountable for any losses, not their parents. Someone mentioned earlier today that the public library gives library cards to children over 12 without the parent's signature. In many states children under 18 cannot legally enter into contracts. Since a library card is evidence of a contract, I suspect that if a child over 12 but under 18 checked out materials and failed to return them, the only recourse the library would have would be to cancel the library card. Certainly the parents would not be responsible, and since the child was under the legal age to enter into a contract, the child wouldn't be responsible, either. I realize that many of you feel that if material meets your selection guides it is appropriate for all students in your building, and no one should overrule you without going through a formal challenge process. That isn't the situation that started this thread. The parents simply asked that their child not be permitted to check out any books on a certain topic. They didn't ask for those books to be removed from the shelves. Nothing is being censored. The parents simply asked the school to help them enforce their own rules with their own children. David Lininger, kb0zke LMS, Hickory County R-1 Schools Urbana, MO 65767 mailto: tss003@mail.connect.more.net =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-= All postings to LM_NET are protected under copyright law. To quit LM_NET (or set-reset NOMAIL or DIGEST, etc.) send email to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL or 3) SET LM_NET DIGEST 4) SET LM_NET MAIL * Please allow for confirmation from Listserv. For LM_NET Help see: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archives: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml See also EL-Announce for announcements from library media vendors: http://www.mindspring.com/~el-announce/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=