Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Posted for Ann Dutton Ewbank, and as originally posted on AASLForum: ---------------------------------- Colleagues, See the link below to read the story about Peggy Rudd and Gene Hainer's meeting with the US Department of Education regarding the classification of school librarians. http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=News&template=/ ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=111470 Now for my commentary: There is quite a backstory about how this meeting came to be, and it involves the concerted efforts of many people from the grass roots on up to the tall trees. For several years, concerned AASL members in Arizona have been trying to make sense of the fact that librarians are lumped into a fiscal classification called "non-instructional," even though the primary job duty of a school librarian is indeed instructional. We spoke with our state auditor general, our state legislators, our state congressional delegation, and our state superintendent about the issue to no avail. Only when we brought the issue to our state librarian, GladysAnn Wells, who was then president of COSLA (Chief Officers of State Library Agencies), did the dominoes begin to fall. GladysAnn queried the other 49 members of COSLA about the issue and then wrote a letter to Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings in favor of moving school librarians into the "instructional" classification as well as for inclusion in NCLB as required to be highly qualified. GladysAnn was originally slated to be at the meeting but had last minute business in Arizona, so Gene and Peggy stepped up and did a marvelous job of advocating our position. This meeting was months in the making and required a lot of hard work to get it to happen. Congratulations to all of the people who got the ball rolling. My concern (which I have expressed on the Forum before) is that there are groups that are advocating this position to Secretary Spellings independently of each other. Wouldn't it make more sense to have a unified front to bring to the Secretary? It would certainly be a powerful statement if all of the groups working on this issue would communicate. These are the groups that are working or should be working on the issue: 1. AASL- Staff met with ALA Research and ALA Media Relations office to discuss strategy in November 2005 as a response to Affiliate Concern. 2. AASL Affiliate Assembly- approved a concern regarding school librarian classification in June 2005. 3. NCLIS (National Commission on Libraries and Information Science)- sent letter to Sec. Spellings advocating inclusion in NCLB in June 2005. 4. ALA Washington Office: Prepared a position statement on inclusion in NCLB in 2004. 5. ALA Task Force on School Libraries- Actions unknown 6. COSLA- sent letter to Sec. Spellings in September 2005 and met with Carolyn Snowbarger (DOE) in November 2005. 7. IMLS (Institute of Museum and Library Services)- Actions unknown 8. AASL Legislation Committee- Actions unknown Changing the classification of school librarians in the NCES definition should be AASL's number one priority right now, because all funding issues relate back to it and it is also related to the inclusion/exclusion of librarians in NCLB. What can AASL do to facilitate communication among the above named groups in order to provide a unified front when asking for these changes? Create a special committee? If there are others interested in calling for a special committee, please contact me. According to the AASL Bylaws, "Special committees, with specific charges to be completed by designated times, may be established at any time by the AASL president with the approval of the AASL Board of Directors or by request of the AASL membership." Thanks, Ann (The opinions expressed in this email are my own and do not represent the Arizona Library Association). Ann Dutton Ewbank, Ph.D. adutton1 AT cox.net 8th Grade Reading Teacher Cholla Middle School President-elect- Arizona Library Association http://www.phxlibris.com ----------------------------------------------------------- Note from Alice: Based on informal research I did 2 years ago, at least 20 states classify school llibrarians as non-instructional, and/or 'educational services." Do YOU know how your state classifies your job? Alice Yucht, aka Alice in InfoLand writer, speaker, mentor, curmudgeon, and Library Management / Information Skills consultant Highland Park, New Jersey ayucht at gmail dot com http:www.aliceinfo.org "We may be service-oriented, but we don't have to be servants." -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------