Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Shonda has asked for testimonials. Here is mine. In my first school library position (1992), I served in an elementary school with 750 students. I met with every student and classroom teacher (CRT) in the building - 29 scheduled back-to-back classes each week. There were two advantages of this school's culture that helped me move our library program to a half-fixed, half-flexible schedule. First, the CRTs were required by the principal to remain in the library during the "library lessons." She believed that CRTs should know what was being taught in the library and the only way to know that was to be present. (This was not true across the board in this district.) The second feature of this school was a strong teaming model. Grade-level teams met for two hours every Wednesday afternoon. I met with two teams each week so I reached all the teams in a one-month period. The lessons I taught in the library were related to the classroom curriculum and at times, they were collaboratively planned - and co-taught. At the December faculty meeting that year, the principal "allowed" me to ask the faculty if they would agree to an every other week fixed schedule. They knew that I was an effective teacher who helped them meet their classroom learning objectives. They had SEEN me work. In the second half of the year, I met with 14 or 15 classes each week on a fixed schedule, freeing up 14 or 15 time blocks for collaboratively planned, taught, and assessed lessons and units of instruction. I don't know if I could have moved that faculty to a fully-flexible schedule because the district transferred me to my Waterloo the next year. At my second elementary school (same district), I had 23 scheduled classes a week. CRTs were not required to remain in the library with their students and most of the time, the children were my sole responsibility (including one class of monolingual Spanish speakers at each grade level. My second language is French.) I worked with grade-level teams on a rotating basis "to fill" the empty slots on my schedule. I was miserable and felt that my teaching was not valued by CRTs and the principal nor was it particularly effective or valuable to students. In the fourth quarter of the year, I convinced the principal to put forward the idea of the flexible schedule (which she had told me she would institute during my interview for the position). The CRTs "gave" it to me and they planned with me, some co-taught with me, and we booked the library every minute of every day for 9 weeks. I worked incredibly hard and the CRTs, most of them reluctantly, admitted that co-taught lessons were more effective for student learning. At the end of the year, the principal told me she was going to let the CRTs vote on the library schedule. I told her that I knew what the outcome would be and that I would resign. She protested and said the CRTs would vote for what is best for students. Surprise! The majority voted for the fixed schedule, and I resigned to pursue working in a neighboring school district where I could practice school librarianship to the best of my ability (in flexibly scheduled, fully-integrated, collaborative school library programs). The bottom line: CRTs must SEE that our work helps them meet their instructional needs and the learning needs of their students. Principals must stand up for school library programs that best serve students and educators. Unless there is language in the consensus agreement related to "specials" providing planning time, it is up to CRTs, teacher-librarians, and principals to re-evaluate this "tradition" in light of what works for student learning. Best, Judi Judi Moreillon, M.L.S., Ph.D. Literacies and Libraries Consultant Author: <http://tinyurl.com/yzvy5g> Collaborative Strategies for Teaching Reading Comprehension: Maximizing Your Impact <http://storytrail.com/> http://storytrail.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/sub/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html --------------------------------------------------------------------