Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
I'm not sure about others' reasoning but here's what I tell my students: Wikipedia is a great but unreliable source of information, we talk about how Wikipedia can be changed by anyone and why that means that info could be unreliable, but we also talk about how great it can be for getting a feel for a topic, finding key words, getting an overview of an unfamiliar topic. However, because it is subject to change and editing, I tell them once they use it to get an overview of the topic, they should confirm whatever data/quotations they are going to use in other sources. For example, if I read WIKI on Shakespeare, I'll learn a lot, get a big picture. Then I'm ready to go on to Britannica, a print biography, a database, a reliable website and gather my facts and quotes. If I get all facts and quotes from other sources, in a WORKS CITED, I would NOT include Wikipedia because I did not, in fact, cite them. However, if I do quote or use info from Wikipedia, I would need to cite it. I encourage them to use it as an informal starting place not a academic source which is why most of the time even if they start there, they won't cite it. Most teachers won't accept WIKI as a citation . . So that's another reason for using it to get general info but finding actual quotations/facts for ones project elsewhere. This might different if one is required to do a BIBLIOGRAPHY versus a WORKS CITED page----I'm most familiar with MLA Works Cited in which one only cites sources directly used. Team and Family, Katrina Baecht | KIPP Austin Librarian office: 512-501-3586 | fax: 501-3587 8509 FM 969, Bldg 676 | Austin, TX 78724 kbaecht@kippaustin.org "Be the change you wish to see in the world." -----Original Message----- From: School Library Media & Network Communications [mailto:LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Liz Herman Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:22 PM To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Subject: Re: Wikipedia.... and bibliographies I always caution people *not* to use Wikipedia as a major source, using the substitution of a photograph of the Emperor from "Star Wars" for the new Pope that occurred repeatedly over a week or so after he was elected to the position (until wikipedia "froze" the entry for a period of time). However, it *can* be a half-decent starting point for research, even if a step below encyclopedias... and I always stress that further research should be done to verify the information found in a more reliable source. But I understand why people warn students (and adults) away from it in general. What I don't understand is the lack of citing it as a resource used, and the few entries in LM_NET in which the LMS has suggested that it is a good jumping off point but that they tell students not to cite it after encouraging its use as that jumping off point. My understanding has always been that if you use a source, you should give credit to that source. Period. While it may not (and shouldn't) be the only source, for middle school onward it can be a useful tool, if for nothing other than recommended websites - the sort that you can verify, such as museums and other "scholarly" organizations. It seems to me that denying its use when you *have* used it goes against all the rules of citing/giving credit to your sources. If you encourage it (or encyclopedias) as a jumping off point, how do you justify telling students not to cite it in their bibliographies? -Liz Herman (not currently in a school, but still in Howard County, MD) imcozit@verizon.net -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please note: All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. You can prevent most e-mail filters from deleting LM_NET postings by adding LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU to your e-mail address book. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. * LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ * LM_NET Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/ * EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://lm-net.info/ * LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html * LM_NET Wiki: http://lmnet.wikispaces.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------