Previous by Date | Next by Date | Date Index
Previous by Thread | Next by Thread
| Thread Index
| LM_NET
Archive
| |
Dear Doug As usual you are spot on! If you took everything out of my library, you would have a large barn, so what I have done is partition it into 'rooms' using the shelves (no lines of stacks here) and so immediately it is more inviting. This year about a third of it is for seniors (Yr 5/6) only at lunch time, and they have a lounge suite, coffee tables, computers, work spaces, their senior fiction collection AND a loud CD player which is on all the time during lunch break. Never have I seen so many in there at lunch, and the most unlikely kids! Chess is popular, some do their homework (and there is research evidence to suggest that this age group cannot work in silence), others just chat or read. But they are there - they are exposed to what we offer and are forming habits and attitudes about libraries. The rest of the place is for the littlies and they are always there, especially in the bean bags or playing chess or drawing or playing schools or whatever. The only thing I don't allow is running. And again - they are there and exposed to what we offer and are forming their attitudes and habits. There are some photos at http://www.palmdps.act.edu.au/resource_centre/lunchtime/lunchtime.htm taken 18 months ago - I will update these soon! Barbara Barbara Braxton Teacher-Librarian Palmerston District Primary School PALMERSTON ACT 2913 AUSTRALIA T. 61 2 6205 6162 F. 61 2 6205 7242 E. barbara@austarmetro.com.au W. http://www.palmdps.act.edu.au -----Original Message----- From: School Library Media & Network Communications [mailto:LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU]On Behalf Of Doug Johnson Sent: Saturday, 8 March 2003 2:28 AM To: LM_NET@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU Subject: "Are libraries obsolete?" is the wrong question Hi folks, I've been half following the conversation evoked by the recommendation to read Mr. Herring's article from American Libraries http://www.ala.org/alonline/news/10reasons.html. While I agree with most of what Mr. Herring has to say (and indeed have written similar arguments myself <http://www.doug-johnson.com/dougwri/internet.html>, I am beginning to wonder how helpful such articles and arguments really are for the health of our profession. The article suggest no way to change the situation he finds deplorable. I don't blame regular folks for increasingly using the Internet rather than libraries. Just yesterday, I saved a (short, but darned cold) walk across the alley to our lovely high school media center to find a copy of R. L. Stevenson's "The Bottle Imp" short story by finding it in less than 3 minutes on the web. It is really, really handy to one's information needs met right at one's desk or in one's home. Yet, I have no doubt that SOME libraries will survive despite the increasing use of the Internet to fulfill needs previously met by those libraries. The libraries that will continue to thrive will be those which meet real needs that CANNOT be met by the Internet (or bookstores or classrooms). And defining, discovering and emphasizing those needs is what our profession should be doing right now rather than writing well-intentioned, but awfully defensive articles like Mr. Herring's. There are a great number of physical businesses and institutions that might very well feel threatened by the increased use of the Internet: book stores, travel agents, banks, and stock brokers, just to name a few. Even virtual schools are now taking the place of brick and mortar buildings for many students. So how are the savvy among these institutions surviving? Here are a few things that pop immediately to mind: 1. By providing a physical comfort that the Internet does not. I still buy books and spend time at our Barnes & Noble because I like having coffee there, sitting in the comfy chairs, and handling physical books. 2. By providing expertise that as an Internet user I do not have. My travel agent knows more about vacation destinations than I do - or am willing to take the time to research and read about on the Internet. 3. By providing "high touch" experiences to offset the "high tech" environments. I think it was John Naisbitt in his early '80's book Megatrends that predicted that the more people use isolating technologies, the greater they will need avenues for face-to-face human interaction and socialization. This is why I still like going to the public library to read the paper sometimes instead of reading it online - I see and meet people there. Internet usage is lonely - even for the chronic chatters, I'm guessing. 4. By recognizing and using the Internet to compliment one's business. I still value my bank down on Hickory Street despite the fact I can check my miserable account balances online, have my paltry paycheck direct deposited, visit the impersonal instant tellers to get cash, and pay some of my horrendous bills electronically. I don't go in the physical building much anymore, but I use their banking services more than ever. I don't see the Internet displacing Wells-Fargo anytime soon. Why? So let's take just these four ways in which a physical experience may be superior than a virtual experience (and I am sure there are many more) and think about how we in school libraries can capitalize on these qualities rather than try to compete head-to-head with the Internet. (Darwin called this adaptation and recognized successful species were good at it.) 1. Physical comfort and welcoming environment. This means creating a library where kids and teachers REALLY like to be. Comfy chairs, friendly atmosphere, low-stress, safe, and forgiving. If my library is not a wonderful place to be, kids and teachers will stay on the Internet or in the classroom. Period. A frightful quote was given in the Pew study "Digital Disconnect" by a middle school student: "The Internet is like a librarian without the bad attitude or breath." OUCH! 2. Expertise. Classroom teachers still send kids to the library because the librarian is better at helping them find information or complete a task (especially in technology) than the teacher him/herself can. Do we have a curriculum and skills that no one but us CAN teach? 3. Social experiences. Are our libraries places for kids to interact with each other in positive ways? Instead of the library being the tomb and the study hall/computer lab being socialization central, maybe we should reverse those atmospheres. 4. Complimentary use. This means not buying (or buying less of) the sorts of things kids are now getting online - paper magazines, current events sources, print indices, etc. It means buying more online resources since that is the format kids find most usable and convenient. It means having a very useable library webpage - tailored specifically one's school curriculum - accessible from home. How about providing online reference services? I am deeply troubled by reading about cut after cut after cut in school library programs throughout the nation and deeply sympathize with those whose jobs are gone and feel their work has not been appreciated. We can and should mourn with and for them. (As my father used to say, "There but for the grace of God go I." But as individuals, we cannot let our reactions end with simply being rueful - we need to figure out how our services need to change in order to meet the needs of teachers and students who DO use the Internet, to remain absolutely vital to schools that ARE strapped for funds, and to be seen as important by decision-makers who DO allocate funds in zero-sum game. Sorry about the rant here. I hope we all keep thinking about things we can do than the Internet can't. All the best, Doug ************ Doug Johnson Director of Media and Technology I.S.D. 77, Mankato Public Schools Box 8713, Mankato MN 56002-8713 Voice: 507-387-7698, Fax: 507-387-2496 E-mail: dougj@doug-johnson.com Web: www.doug-johnson.com "The fates guide those who go willingly; those who do not, they drag." Seneca =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archive: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml LM_NET Select/EL-Announce: http://www.cuenet.com/archive/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ven.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=- All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law. To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL 3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation. LM_NET Help & Information: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ Archive: http://askeric.org/Virtual/Listserv_Archives/LM_NET.shtml LM_NET Select/EL-Announce: http://www.cuenet.com/archive/el-announce/ LM_NET Supporters: http://ericir.syr.edu/lm_net/ven.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-