OK. I have to chime in on the pet peeve discussion. Frankly, my pet =
peeve is people replying to the list when they are answering an =
individual's questions. Isn't the idea that we are to reply to the =
individual who then posts a hit of all our wonderful ideas and =
contributions??? Sometimes I read the same reply on the list and then =
again in the hit.
Fortunately, most people seem to understand this concept. When I have =
posted a target, most people have replied only to me and then I have =
posted the hit a couple of days later. But there are always the same few =
people who seem to post to the list. Is this a trust issue? Is it that =
they don't think a hit will be posted? It sure would help the volume of =
messages on the list if we would follow this guideline which has been =
reiterated by Peter countless times.=20
My 2 cents!
Nancy Dickinson, Librarian
Hillsboro Elem. School
Hillsboro, TN 37342
fsufan23@charter.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------
All LM_NET postings are protected by copyright law.
To change your LM_NET status, e-mail to: listserv@listserv.syr.edu
In the message write EITHER: 1) SIGNOFF LM_NET 2) SET LM_NET NOMAIL
3) SET LM_NET MAIL 4) SET LM_NET DIGEST * Allow for confirmation.
LM_NET Help & Information: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/
Archive: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/archive/
EL-Announce with LM_NET Select: http://elann.biglist.com/el-announce/
LM_NET Supporters: http://www.eduref.org/lm_net/ven.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
LM_NET
Mailing List Home